Department of Medicine-Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, 100 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite 550, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6996 USA.
Br J Cancer. 2010 Jan 19;102(2):301-15. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605498. Epub 2010 Jan 5.
BACKGROUND: Cancer patients often develop the potentially debilitating condition of anaemia. Numerous controlled studies indicate that erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) can raise haemoglobin levels and reduce transfusion requirements in anaemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. To evaluate recent safety concerns regarding ESAs, we carried out a meta-analysis of controlled ESA oncology trials to examine whether ESA use affects survival, disease progression and risk of venous-thromboembolic events. METHODS: This meta-analysis included studies from the 2006 Cochrane meta-analysis, studies published/updated since the 2006 Cochrane report, and unpublished trial data from Amgen and Centocor Ortho Biotech. The 60 studies analysed (15 323 patients) were conducted in the settings of chemotherapy/radiochemotherapy, radiotherapy only treatment or anaemia of cancer. Data were summarised using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Results indicated that ESA use did not significantly affect mortality (60 studies: OR=1.06; 95% CI: 0.97-1.15) or disease progression (26 studies: OR=1.01; 95% CI: 0.90-1.14), but increased the risk for venous-thromoboembolic events (44 studies: OR=1.48; 95% CI: 1.28-1.72). CONCLUSION: Though this meta-analysis showed no significant effect of ESAs on survival or disease progression, prospectively designed, future randomised clinical trials will further examine the safety and efficacy of ESAs when used according to the revised labelling information.
背景:癌症患者常患有潜在致残性贫血症。大量对照研究表明,红细胞生成刺激剂(ESAs)可提高血红蛋白水平并减少接受化疗的贫血癌症患者的输血需求。为评估近期有关 ESAs 的安全性问题,我们对对照性 ESA 肿瘤学试验进行了荟萃分析,以检验 ESA 使用是否会影响生存、疾病进展和静脉血栓栓塞事件的风险。
方法:本荟萃分析纳入了来自 2006 年 Cochrane 荟萃分析的研究、自 2006 年 Cochrane 报告发表以来公布/更新的研究,以及 Amgen 和 Centocor Ortho Biotech 的未发表试验数据。分析的 60 项研究(共 15323 例患者)在化疗/放化疗、仅放疗或癌症贫血的背景下开展。数据使用比值比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)进行总结。
结果:结果表明,ESA 使用并未显著影响死亡率(60 项研究:OR=1.06;95%CI:0.97-1.15)或疾病进展(26 项研究:OR=1.01;95%CI:0.90-1.14),但增加了静脉血栓栓塞事件的风险(44 项研究:OR=1.48;95%CI:1.28-1.72)。
结论:尽管本荟萃分析显示 ESA 对生存或疾病进展无显著影响,但前瞻性设计的未来随机临床试验将进一步检验根据修订的标签信息使用 ESA 的安全性和疗效。
Support Care Cancer. 2013-6-18
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016-3
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2024-6
J Exp Pharmacol. 2021-6-24
Clin Transl Oncol. 2021-5
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008-7