Florida Center for Reading Research and Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Ann Dyslexia. 2010 Jun;60(1):40-56. doi: 10.1007/s11881-009-0032-y. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
The relative effectiveness of two computer-assisted instructional programs designed to provide instruction and practice in foundational reading skills was examined. First-grade students at risk for reading disabilities received approximately 80 h of small-group instruction in four 50-min sessions per week from October through May. Approximately half of the instruction was delivered by specially trained teachers to prepare students for their work on the computer, and half was delivered by the computer programs. At the end of first grade, there were no differences in student reading performance between students assigned to the different intervention conditions, but the combined-intervention students performed significantly better than control students who had been exposed to their school's normal reading program. Significant differences were obtained for phonemic awareness, phonemic decoding, reading accuracy, rapid automatic naming, and reading comprehension. A follow-up test at the end of second grade showed a similar pattern of differences, although only differences in phonemic awareness, phonemic decoding, and rapid naming remained statistically reliable.
本研究旨在考察两种计算机辅助教学程序在提供基础阅读技能教学和练习方面的相对效果。有阅读障碍风险的一年级学生在 10 月至 5 月期间每周接受 4 次、每次 50 分钟的小组教学,共计约 80 小时。大约一半的教学由经过专门培训的教师进行,以帮助学生为计算机学习做准备,另一半则由计算机程序提供。在一年级结束时,在不同干预条件下分配的学生之间的阅读成绩没有差异,但接受了综合干预的学生比接受了学校正常阅读计划的对照组学生表现要好。在语音意识、音位解码、阅读准确性、快速自动命名和阅读理解方面都取得了显著差异。在二年级结束时的后续测试中也出现了类似的差异模式,尽管只有语音意识、音位解码和快速命名方面的差异仍然具有统计学意义。