Suppr超能文献

激光前列腺切除术的并发症:近期数据回顾。

Complications of laser prostatectomy: a review of recent data.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2010 Feb;28(1):53-62. doi: 10.1007/s00345-009-0504-z. Epub 2010 Jan 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Laser techniques for the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) due to benign prostate enlargement (BPE) have emerged as an alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and open prostatectomy (OP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Medline search over the past 4 years was performed to assess the safety, intra- and postoperative morbidity of various laser techniques.

RESULTS

Data on holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) show the highest grade of evidence with two meta-analyses available and prove the low intra- and postoperative morbidity with reproducible long-term results. Photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) with the Greenlightlaser (potassium titanyl phosphate, KTP or lithium borate, LBO) is characterized by excellent haemostatic properties in patients with or without oral anticoagulation. Long-term results show a reoperation rate comparable with TURP; however, there is a lack of randomized trials. Various types of diode lasers with different wavelengths are available for laser vaporization; despite their favourable haemostatic properties, a higher invasion depth seems to result in necrosis of the tissue leading to a higher rate of reoperation. Thulium-laser resection of the prostate shows promising intra- and postoperative morbidity, but data are limited and initial results need to be confirmed in large-scale trials.

CONCLUSION

In summary, HoLEP- and KTP-, or LBO-laser vaporization of the prostate are the most mature techniques of laser prostatectomy and treatment alternatives to TURP and OP, whereas the clinical value and durability of procedures with diode laser systems and the thulium laser need to be confirmed in high-quality prospective RCTs.

摘要

简介

激光技术已成为治疗良性前列腺增生(BPE)导致的膀胱出口梗阻(BOO)的一种替代方法,可替代经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)和开放性前列腺切除术(OP)。

材料和方法

在过去 4 年中,我们进行了 Medline 检索,以评估各种激光技术的安全性、围手术期发病率。

结果

钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)的数据提供了最高级别的证据,有两项荟萃分析可用,并证明了其具有较低的围手术期发病率和可重复的长期效果。绿激光前列腺汽化术(磷酸钛钾,KTP 或硼酸锂,LBO)的特点是在有或没有口服抗凝剂的患者中具有极好的止血特性。长期结果显示与 TURP 相当的再次手术率;然而,缺乏随机试验。各种类型的二极管激光具有不同的波长,可用于激光汽化;尽管它们具有良好的止血特性,但更深的侵入似乎会导致组织坏死,从而导致更高的再次手术率。钬激光前列腺切除术显示出良好的围手术期发病率,但数据有限,初始结果需要在大规模试验中得到证实。

结论

总之,HoLEP 和 KTP 或 LBO 激光前列腺汽化术是最成熟的激光前列腺切除术技术,是 TURP 和 OP 的替代治疗方法,而二极管激光系统和钬激光的治疗方法的临床价值和耐久性需要在高质量的前瞻性 RCT 中得到证实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验