Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Clinic of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Apr;267(4):483-94. doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-1191-5. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
This article gives an overview on different current strategies of assay-based response evaluation in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) and critically summarizes their role and needs for future clinical evaluation. Due to a growing amount of data of phase III clinical trials of multimodality treatment options for HNSCC, treatment planning in regard to optimal outcome is becoming an interdisciplinary challenge. New concepts such as induction chemotherapy with bi- or ternary combinations of chemotherapeutics, integration of targeted therapies, concurrent and sequential chemoradiation concepts, and multimodality-based organ preservation strategies strongly compete with traditional definitive surgical procedures. Moreover, the outcome is difficult to predict due to heterogeneity of a tumor's response, impaired late functional outcome, and increased late toxicity if simultaneously applied to radiation. Retrospectively looking at non-responders with tumors classified as resectable, primary surgery is very likely to have achieved better results, since chemoradiation causes a high degree of early and late toxicities leading to extremely complicated terms and conditions in surgery following current multimodal therapeutic strategies. Unfortunately, predictive information on response characteristics of a given tumor before starting the therapy is not available in daily routine, although heterogeneity in response of a given tumor entity to treatments has been known for decades. Therefore, current therapy strategies for HNSCC still have to ignore this fact, creating an urgent need for the development of proper predictive assays. There are interesting clinical observations showing that response on induction chemotherapy may predict the outcome after radiotherapy. Some trials use this empiric phenomenon to pre-select non-responders for primary surgical treatment avoiding severe salvage complications after failure of complete chemoradiation treatment. Moving one step further, recent literature and our own investigations implicate that response evaluation of the individual patient's HNSCC in a suitable ex vivo assay just before starting the treatment is mature for clinical research. To this end, essential needs and hints are addressed and discussed.
本文概述了当前基于检测的头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)反应评估的不同策略,并批判性地总结了它们在未来临床评估中的作用和需求。由于 HNSCC 多模式治疗方案的 III 期临床试验数据不断增加,针对最佳疗效的治疗计划正在成为一个跨学科的挑战。新的概念,如双药或三药联合诱导化疗、靶向治疗的整合、同期和序贯放化疗概念以及基于多模式的器官保存策略,与传统的确定性手术方法激烈竞争。此外,由于肿瘤反应的异质性、晚期功能预后受损以及同时应用于放疗时增加的晚期毒性,使得结果难以预测。回顾性地观察那些被归类为可切除的肿瘤的无反应者,原发手术很可能会取得更好的结果,因为放化疗会导致高度的早期和晚期毒性,从而导致在遵循当前多模式治疗策略的情况下,手术后的条件非常复杂。不幸的是,在开始治疗之前,对于给定肿瘤的反应特征的预测信息在日常实践中不可用,尽管几十年来人们已经知道了给定肿瘤实体对治疗的反应异质性。因此,目前 HNSCC 的治疗策略仍然必须忽略这一事实,这就迫切需要开发适当的预测检测方法。有一些有趣的临床观察表明,诱导化疗的反应可能预测放疗后的结果。一些试验利用这一经验现象,在完全放化疗治疗失败后,预先选择原发手术治疗的非反应者,以避免严重的挽救性并发症。更进一步,最近的文献和我们自己的研究表明,在开始治疗前对个体患者的 HNSCC 进行适当的离体检测来评估反应,已经成熟到可以进行临床研究的程度。为此,本文提出并讨论了基本需求和提示。