Hoffmann Thomas K
Dept. of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Essen, Essen, Germany.
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;11:Doc03. doi: 10.3205/cto000085. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
Head and neck cancers, most of which are squamous cell tumours, have an unsatisfactory prognosis despite intensive local treatment. This can be attributed, among other factors, to tumour recurrences inside or outside the treated area, and metastases at more distal locations. These tumours therefore require not only the standard surgical and radiation treatments, but also effective systemic modalities. The main option here is antineoplastic chemotherapy, which is firmly established in the palliative treatment of recurrent or metastatic stages of disease, and is used with curative intent in the form of combined simultaneous or adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with inoperable or advanced tumour stages. Neoadjuvant treatment strategies for tumour reduction before surgery have yet to gain acceptance. Induction chemotherapy protocols before radiotherapy have to date been used in patients at high risk of distant metastases or as an aid for decision-making ("chemoselection") in those with extensive laryngeal cancers, prior to definitive chemoradiotherapy or laryngectomy. Triple-combination induction therapy (taxanes, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil) shows high remission rates with significant toxicity and, in combination with (chemo-)radiotherapy, is currently being compared with simultaneous chemoradiotherapy; the current gold standard with regards to efficacy and long-term toxicity.A further systemic treatment strategy, called "targeted therapy", has been developed to help increase specificity and reduce toxicity. An example of targeted therapy, EGFR-specific antibodies, can be used in palliative settings and, in combination with radiotherapy, to treat advanced head and neck cancers. A series of other novel biologicals such as signal cascade inhibitors, genetic agents, or immunotherapies, are currently being evaluated in large-scale clinical studies, and could prove useful in patients with advanced, recurring or metastatic head and neck cancers. When developing a lasting, individualised systemic tumour therapy, the critical evaluation criteria are not only efficacy and acute toxicity but also (long-term) quality-of-life and the identification of dedicated predictive biomarkers.
头颈部癌症大多为鳞状细胞瘤,尽管进行了强化局部治疗,其预后仍不尽人意。这可归因于多种因素,包括治疗区域内外的肿瘤复发以及更远端部位的转移。因此,这些肿瘤不仅需要标准的手术和放射治疗,还需要有效的全身治疗方式。这里的主要选择是抗肿瘤化疗,它在疾病复发或转移阶段的姑息治疗中已得到确立,并以同步或辅助放化疗联合的形式用于无法手术或肿瘤晚期患者的根治性治疗。术前肿瘤缩小的新辅助治疗策略尚未得到广泛认可。迄今为止,放疗前的诱导化疗方案已用于远处转移高危患者,或作为广泛喉癌患者在确定性放化疗或喉切除术之前的决策辅助(“化疗选择”)。三联诱导疗法(紫杉烷类、顺铂、5-氟尿嘧啶)显示出高缓解率,但毒性较大,目前正在与同步放化疗进行比较,同步放化疗是目前在疗效和长期毒性方面的金标准。
另一种全身治疗策略,即“靶向治疗”,已被开发出来以提高特异性并降低毒性。靶向治疗的一个例子,即表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)特异性抗体,可用于姑息治疗,并与放疗联合用于治疗晚期头颈部癌症。一系列其他新型生物制剂,如信号级联抑制剂、基因制剂或免疫疗法,目前正在大规模临床研究中进行评估,可能对晚期、复发或转移性头颈部癌症患者有用。在制定持久的个体化全身肿瘤治疗方案时,关键的评估标准不仅包括疗效和急性毒性,还包括(长期)生活质量以及确定专门的预测生物标志物。