Department of Psychology, University of Oklahoma, OK, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):80-95. doi: 10.1037/a0017407.
Most modern research on the effects of feedback during learning has assumed that feedback is an error correction mechanism. Recent studies of feedback-timing effects have suggested that feedback might also strengthen initially correct responses. In an experiment involving cued recall of trivia facts, we directly tested several theories of feedback-timing effects and also examined the effects of restudy and retest trials following immediate and delayed feedback. Results were not consistent with theories assuming that the only function of feedback is to correct initial errors but instead supported a theoretical account assuming that delaying feedback strengthens initially correct responses due to the spacing of encoding opportunities: Delaying feedback increased the probability of correct response perseveration on the final retention test but had minimal effects on error correction or error perseveration probabilities. In a 2nd experiment, the effects of varying the lags between study, test, and feedback trials during learning provided further support for the spacing hypothesis. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).
大多数关于学习过程中反馈作用的现代研究都假定,反馈是一种错误纠正机制。最近关于反馈时机效应的研究表明,反馈也可能增强最初的正确反应。在一项涉及线索回忆琐事的实验中,我们直接检验了几种反馈时机效应理论,并考察了即时反馈和延迟反馈后进行复习和重测的效果。结果与仅假设反馈唯一功能是纠正初始错误的理论不一致,而是支持一种理论解释,即由于编码机会的间隔,延迟反馈会增强最初的正确反应:延迟反馈增加了最终保持测试中正确反应持续的可能性,但对错误纠正或错误持续的可能性影响最小。在第二项实验中,在学习过程中改变学习、测试和反馈之间的时间间隔的效果进一步支持了间隔假说。