Wayne S J, Rhyne R L, Thompson R E, Davis M
Department of Family, Community, and Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque 87131.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Mar;39(3):308-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01655.x.
It has been suggested that two common methods of sampling nursing home populations, cross-sectional sampling and discharge sampling, result in samples with different characteristics and lengths of stay. Comparison of these samples to a sample of nursing home admissions has not been studied. This study compares characteristics and lengths of stay among cross-sectional, discharge, and admission samples. All current residents of three nursing homes in February 1987 made up the cross-sectional sample, all admissions in the following year made up the admission sample, and all discharges in the same year made up the discharge sample. The results of comparing these three sampling techniques show that the most striking differences occur between the cross-sectional sample and the admission sample. Persons in the cross-sectional sample tended to have longer nursing home stays as well as less social support and more behavioral and functional problems than persons in the admission sample, who tended to have shorter stays and more acute medical problems. The discharge sample was more similar to the admission sample than it was to the cross-sectional sample; however, some differences were found between the discharge and admission samples. Based on the differences found among the three samples, appropriate uses for each sample are discussed.
有人提出,疗养院人群的两种常见抽样方法,即横断面抽样和出院抽样,会产生具有不同特征和住院时长的样本。尚未对这些样本与疗养院入院样本进行比较研究。本研究比较了横断面样本、出院样本和入院样本的特征及住院时长。1987年2月,三家疗养院的所有现住居民构成横断面样本,次年的所有入院者构成入院样本,同年的所有出院者构成出院样本。比较这三种抽样技术的结果表明,横断面样本与入院样本之间的差异最为显著。与入院样本中的人相比,横断面样本中的人往往在疗养院的住院时间更长,社会支持更少,行为和功能问题更多,入院样本中的人住院时间较短,有更多急性医疗问题。出院样本与入院样本的相似性高于与横断面样本的相似性;然而,在出院样本和入院样本之间也发现了一些差异。基于在三个样本中发现的差异,讨论了每个样本的适当用途。