Ricotta Joseph J, Malgor Rafael D, Oderich Gustavo S
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Feb;24(2):269-77. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.08.009. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
Rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) carries a high morbidity and mortality despite vast improvements in the care of critically ill patients over the past two decades. Between 50% and 80% of all patients with ruptured AAA do not survive. Endovascular treatment of ruptured AAA has recently become popularized because of its purported advantages to open repair in terms of mortality and morbidity due to its minimally invasive approach. The tabular review herein presented is the second part of our series on endovascular therapy for AAA. Similar to part 1, which emphasized elective procedures, we summarize the results of the world's literature for ruptured endovascular AAA repair in table format to serve as a comprehensive and concise search tool to be utilized in the vascular surgeon's and endovascular specialist's practice.
尽管在过去二十年中危重病患者的护理有了巨大改善，但腹主动脉瘤（AAA）破裂仍具有很高的发病率和死亡率。所有AAA破裂患者中有50%至80%无法存活。由于其微创方法在死亡率和发病率方面相对于开放修复具有所谓的优势，AAA破裂的血管内治疗最近已得到普及。本文呈现的表格综述是我们关于AAA血管内治疗系列的第二部分。与强调择期手术的第一部分类似，我们以表格形式总结了世界文献中AAA破裂血管内修复的结果，作为血管外科医生和血管内专家在实践中使用的全面且简洁的检索工具。
