Suppr超能文献

检测试剂中夫西地酸(CEM-102)药敏性表现:应用于金黄色葡萄球菌的肉汤微量稀释法、纸片扩散法和 E 试验法。

Performance of fusidic acid (CEM-102) susceptibility testing reagents: broth microdilution, disk diffusion, and Etest methods as applied to Staphylococcus aureus.

机构信息

JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa 52317, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Mar;48(3):972-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01829-09. Epub 2010 Jan 6.

Abstract

Fusidic acid (CEM-102) is an established antistaphylococcal agent that has been used in clinical practice for more than 4 decades. The activity of fusidic acid against 778 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus collected from U.S. (53.8% were methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA]) and Canadian (46.5% were MRSA) medical centers was assessed to determine the intermethod accuracy of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and Etest methods. Broth microdilution MIC results were compared by scattergram analysis to zone diameters around commercially available 5- and 10-microg disks. Acceptable correlation (r = 0.74 to 0.76) was observed for the two disk concentrations, and applying breakpoints of < or = 1 microg/ml (> or = 22 mm) for susceptibility (S) and > or = 4 microg/ml (< or = 19 mm) for resistance (R) provided 99.9% absolute intermethod categorical agreement. Reference CLSI MIC versus Etest MIC results (r = 0.77; 728 strains) showed 55.4% identical results and agreement of 99.7% +/- one log2 dilution. The diagnostic susceptibility testing reagents (including Etest) for fusidic acid (CEM-102) performed at an excellent level of intermethod agreement for the proposed breakpoint criteria.

摘要

夫西地酸(CEM-102)是一种已被临床应用超过 40 年的抗葡萄球菌药物。为了确定临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)和 Etest 方法的相互间准确性,我们评估了从美国(53.8%是耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌 [MRSA])和加拿大(46.5%是 MRSA)医疗中心收集的 778 株金黄色葡萄球菌分离株对夫西地酸的活性。通过散点图分析比较肉汤微量稀释 MIC 结果与市售 5 和 10μg 药敏纸片周围的抑菌环直径。两种药敏纸片浓度之间观察到可接受的相关性(r = 0.74 至 0.76),应用敏感性(S)的截断值<或=1μg/ml(>或=22mm)和耐药性(R)的截断值>或=4μg/ml(<或=19mm)可提供 99.9%的绝对相互间分类一致性。参考 CLSI MIC 与 Etest MIC 结果(r = 0.77;728 株)显示 55.4%的结果相同,一致率为 99.7% +/- 1 个对数稀释度。对于建议的截断值标准,夫西地酸(CEM-102)的诊断药敏检测试剂(包括 Etest)表现出极好的相互间一致性水平。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Clinical impact of antibiotic-resistant Gram-positive pathogens.革兰氏阳性耐药病原体的临床影响。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009 Mar;15(3):212-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02738.x.
9

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验