• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血压和胆固醇变异性对弗雷明汉心血管风险评估精度的影响:一项模拟研究。

The effect of blood pressure and cholesterol variability on the precision of Framingham cardiovascular risk estimation: a simulation study.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

J Hum Hypertens. 2010 Oct;24(10):631-8. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2009.114. Epub 2010 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1038/jhh.2009.114
PMID:20054346
Abstract

This simulation study investigates the effects of within-individual variability in estimated cardiovascular risk on categorization of patients as high risk. Published estimates of within-individual blood pressure and cholesterol variability were used to generate blood pressure and cholesterol levels for hypothetical subjects at a range of ages. These were used to calculate the estimated cardiovascular risk of each individual. The relationship between an individual's mean cardiovascular risk and within-individual coefficient of variation for cardiovascular risk was determined. Using the derived relationship, mean cardiovascular risk and within-individual variation in risk was calculated for 5018 adults from a population health survey. From this, was determined their probability of being classified as high risk (>20% 10-year cardiovascular risk) and the test characteristics of risk estimation at a range of ages. Within-individual variability in cardiovascular risk and potential for misclassification are both greater in lower-risk populations. At age 35-44 years, the positive predictive value of a diagnosis of high risk is 0.61 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59-0.64), and at age 65-74 years, it is 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.96). About 39% of adults under 45 years diagnosed as high risk are not at high risk. Cardiovascular risk assessment should be targeted at high-risk populations.

摘要

本模拟研究调查了个体内心血管风险估计的变异性对高风险患者分类的影响。使用已发表的个体内血压和胆固醇变异性估计值,为一系列不同年龄的假设对象生成血压和胆固醇水平。这些水平用于计算每个个体的估计心血管风险。确定了个体平均心血管风险与心血管风险个体内变异系数之间的关系。使用得出的关系,为来自一项人群健康调查的 5018 名成年人计算了平均心血管风险和风险的个体内变异。由此确定了他们被归类为高风险(>20%的 10 年心血管风险)的概率,以及在不同年龄段进行风险估计的测试特征。心血管风险的个体内变异性和潜在的分类错误在低风险人群中都更大。在 35-44 岁年龄组,高危诊断的阳性预测值为 0.61(95%置信区间(CI):0.59-0.64),而在 65-74 岁年龄组,阳性预测值为 0.94(95%CI:0.91-0.96)。大约 39%的45 岁以下被诊断为高风险的成年人并非处于高风险。心血管风险评估应针对高风险人群。

相似文献

1
The effect of blood pressure and cholesterol variability on the precision of Framingham cardiovascular risk estimation: a simulation study.血压和胆固醇变异性对弗雷明汉心血管风险评估精度的影响:一项模拟研究。
J Hum Hypertens. 2010 Oct;24(10):631-8. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2009.114. Epub 2010 Jan 7.
2
Misleading measurements: modeling the effects of blood pressure misclassification in a United States population.误导性测量:模拟美国人群中血压误分类的影响
Med Decis Making. 2006 Nov-Dec;26(6):624-32. doi: 10.1177/0272989X06295356.
3
Healthy lifestyles and cardiovascular risk profiles in young Australian adults: the Childhood Determinants of Adult Health Study.澳大利亚年轻成年人的健康生活方式与心血管风险概况:成人健康的儿童期决定因素研究
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009 Dec;16(6):684-9. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3283315888.
4
Comparison of three different methods of assessing cardiovascular disease risk in New Zealanders with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.新西兰2型糖尿病患者三种不同心血管疾病风险评估方法的比较。
N Z Med J. 2008 Sep 5;121(1281):49-57.
5
Direct, progressive association of cardiovascular risk factors with incident proteinuria: results from the Korea Medical Insurance Corporation (KMIC) study.心血管危险因素与蛋白尿发生之间的直接、渐进性关联:韩国医疗保险机构(KMIC)研究结果
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Oct 24;165(19):2299-304. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.19.2299.
6
Should pulse pressure become part of the Framingham risk score?脉压是否应纳入弗明汉姆风险评分?
J Hum Hypertens. 2004 Apr;18(4):279-86. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001669.
7
Effects of additional blood pressure and lipid measurements on the prediction of cardiovascular risk.血压和血脂附加测量对心血管风险预测的影响。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012 Dec;19(6):1474-85. doi: 10.1177/1741826711424494. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
8
Relationship between the metabolic syndrome and the development of hypertension in the Hong Kong Cardiovascular Risk Factor Prevalence Study-2 (CRISPS2).香港心血管危险因素患病率研究-2(CRISPS2)中代谢综合征与高血压发生之间的关系。
Am J Hypertens. 2008 Jan;21(1):17-22. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2007.19.
9
Risk for cardiovascular disease in the elderly and associated Medicare costs: the Framingham Study.老年人心血管疾病风险及相关医疗保险费用:弗雷明汉姆研究
Am J Prev Med. 1993 May-Jun;9(3):146-54.
10
[Total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and blood pressure in relation to life style: results of the first population screening of the Swiss MONIKA Project].[总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇及血压与生活方式的关系:瑞士莫妮卡项目首次人群筛查结果]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1990 Dec 29;120(51-52):1976-88.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of blood pressure and total cholesterol measurement on risk prediction using the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE).血压和总胆固醇测量对使用系统性冠状动脉风险评估(SCORE)进行风险预测的影响。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 May 4;18(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0823-3.
2
The NHS Health Check programme: a comparison against established standards for screening.英国国民健康服务体系健康检查计划:与既定筛查标准的比较。
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Oct;64(627):530-1. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X681997.
3
The effect of chance variability in blood pressure readings on the decision making of general practitioners: an internet-based case vignette study.
血压读数中的偶然变异性对全科医生决策的影响:基于互联网的病例案例研究。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e46556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046556. Epub 2012 Nov 2.