Suppr超能文献

25G玻璃体切割联合超声乳化术与20G玻璃体切割及晶状体超声粉碎术之间的差异。

Differences between the combination of the 25-gauge vitrectomy with phacoemulsification versus 20-gauge vitrectomy and phacofragmentation.

作者信息

Romero-Aroca Pere, Almena-Garcia Matias, Baget-Bernaldiz Marc, Fernández-Ballart Juan, Méndez-Marin Isabel, Bautista-Perez Angel

机构信息

Ophthalmic Service, Hospital Universitario Sant Joan, IISPV, Universidad Rovira I Virgili, Reus, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3:671-9. doi: 10.2147/opth.s7956. Epub 2009 Dec 29.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In the present study we determine the differences observed between 25-gauge-vitrectomy combined with phacoemulsification, and the 20-gauge-vitrectomy combined with pars plana phacofragmentation.

METHODS

A prospective study of a sample of 987 eyes of 661 patients randomly divided into two groups. 25-gauge-vitrectomy plus phacoemulsification included 486 eyes, and 20-gauge-vitrectomy plus phacofragmentation 501 eyes. We evaluated the differences at the time of the surgery, the intra-and postoperative complications, and the variations in intraocular pressure.

RESULTS

The final visual outcome was similar in both groups. The most important differences between groups were: surgical time was faster in group 1 than in group 2, (mean time: 35.16 +/- 3.49, 44.74 +/- 5.30 minutes). Intraoperative complications were more numerous in group 1. In group 1, postoperative low levels of intraocular pressure are present in all patients with 2.77% of patients with hypotension (<8 mmHg), and three choroidal effusion. In group 2, intraocular lens decentration and retinal detachment are more frequent (2.38% and 1.39%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, both techniques have a similar number of complications and have a similar postoperative outcome, and are valid for the management of the pathologies selected.

摘要

引言

在本研究中,我们确定了25G玻璃体切除术联合超声乳化术与20G玻璃体切除术联合晶状体超声粉碎术之间观察到的差异。

方法

对661例患者的987只眼样本进行前瞻性研究,随机分为两组。25G玻璃体切除术加超声乳化术包括486只眼,20G玻璃体切除术加晶状体超声粉碎术501只眼。我们评估了手术时、术中和术后并发症以及眼压变化的差异。

结果

两组的最终视力结果相似。两组之间最重要的差异是:第1组的手术时间比第2组快(平均时间:35.16±3.49、44.74±5.30分钟)。第1组的术中并发症更多。在第1组中,所有患者术后眼压均较低,2.77%的患者出现低血压(<8 mmHg),并有3例脉络膜渗漏。在第2组中,人工晶状体偏心和视网膜脱离更为常见(分别为2.38%和1.39%)。

结论

在本研究中,两种技术的并发症数量相似,术后结果相似,对所选疾病的治疗均有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78b1/2801636/ec6c02f38a2a/opth-3-671f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验