• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对与丙型肝炎及其治疗相关的健康状况的偏好。

Patient's preferences for health scenarios associated with hepatitis C and its treatment.

作者信息

Tinè Fabio

机构信息

Unità di Gastroenterologia, Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia - Cervello, Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2009 Dec 29;3:363-70. doi: 10.2147/ppa.s7684.

DOI:10.2147/ppa.s7684
PMID:20054442
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2802077/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Antiviral therapy with peg-interferon and ribavirin induces sustained virus eradication in 40%-80% of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). We investigated patient views on their involvement in therapeutic decision making and on the desirability of disease and treatment-related outcomes.

METHODS

The control preferences and visual analog scales were administered in a pencil and paper format to a series of 45 patients in order to assess their decisional role, preferences for scenarios of HCV disease and antiviral treatment, and estimates of success required to recommend treatment.

RESULTS

The preferred decisional role of patients was passive in 26 (58%), collaborative in 12 (27%) and active in 7 (15%). Median preference scores ranged from 0.30 to 0.90 for scenarios of disease, from 0.05 to 0.80 for side effects and from 25% to 100% for estimates of benefit to recommend treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our patients prefer to defer to the doctor the final decision in starting therapy in a context of shared decision making. Reported preferences for HCV scenarios are in the range discussed in the literature. The wide variability in the values attributed to side effects by patients with chronic hepatitis C as well as in expected probabilities of successful treatment suggests a need for decision analysis tailored to the individual patient.

摘要

背景与目的

聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林抗病毒治疗可使40%-80%的慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)患者实现病毒持续清除。我们调查了患者对于参与治疗决策以及疾病和治疗相关结果的期望的看法。

方法

采用纸质问卷形式对45例患者进行对照偏好和视觉模拟量表调查,以评估他们的决策角色、对HCV疾病和抗病毒治疗方案的偏好,以及推荐治疗所需的成功概率估计。

结果

患者偏好的决策角色中,26例(58%)为被动,12例(27%)为合作,7例(15%)为主动。疾病方案的中位偏好得分在0.30至0.90之间,副作用的中位偏好得分在0.05至0.80之间,推荐治疗的获益估计概率在25%至100%之间。

结论

在共同决策的背景下,我们的患者更倾向于在开始治疗的最终决策上听从医生的意见。报告的对HCV方案的偏好处于文献中讨论的范围内。慢性丙型肝炎患者对副作用赋予的值以及成功治疗的预期概率存在很大差异,这表明需要针对个体患者进行决策分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dae7/2802077/53a828eda0c8/ppa-3-363f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dae7/2802077/30d8dc0593b7/ppa-3-363f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dae7/2802077/ca241a4114c8/ppa-3-363f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dae7/2802077/8eba43d86c81/ppa-3-363f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dae7/2802077/53a828eda0c8/ppa-3-363f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dae7/2802077/30d8dc0593b7/ppa-3-363f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dae7/2802077/ca241a4114c8/ppa-3-363f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dae7/2802077/8eba43d86c81/ppa-3-363f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dae7/2802077/53a828eda0c8/ppa-3-363f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient's preferences for health scenarios associated with hepatitis C and its treatment.患者对与丙型肝炎及其治疗相关的健康状况的偏好。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2009 Dec 29;3:363-70. doi: 10.2147/ppa.s7684.
2
Preferences and perceived involvement in treatment decision making among Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis.中国慢性乙型肝炎患者的治疗决策偏好和参与度。
Med Decis Making. 2011 Mar-Apr;31(2):245-53. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10375990. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
3
Pegylated interferon alpha-2a and -2b in combination with ribavirin in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a systematic review and economic evaluation.聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a和α-2b联合利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Oct;8(39):iii-iv, 1-125. doi: 10.3310/hta8390.
4
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
5
Sofosbuvir, Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin in the Treatment of an Egyptian Cohort with Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Real-Life Clinical Practice.索磷布韦、聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林在埃及丙型肝炎病毒感染人群真实临床实践中的治疗应用
Infect Disord Drug Targets. 2019;19(2):179-184. doi: 10.2174/1871526518666180912121835.
6
Most Patients of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in India Present Late for Interferon-Based Antiviral Treatment: An Epidemiological Study of 777 Patients from a North Indian Tertiary Care Center.印度大多数丙型肝炎病毒感染患者接受基于干扰素的抗病毒治疗时就诊较晚:一项对北印度一家三级医疗中心777例患者的流行病学研究。
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015 Jun;5(2):134-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 May 21.
7
Decisional control preferences among patients with advanced cancer: An international multicenter cross-sectional survey.晚期癌症患者的决策控制偏好:一项国际多中心横断面调查。
Palliat Med. 2018 Apr;32(4):870-880. doi: 10.1177/0269216317747442. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
8
Clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of tailoring chronic hepatitis C treatment with peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin to HCV genotype and early viral response: a decision analysis based on German guidelines.根据德国指南,针对丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)基因型及早期病毒反应,采用聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2b联合利巴韦林定制慢性丙型肝炎治疗方案的临床有效性和成本效益:一项决策分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(4):341-54. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200927040-00006.
9
Atorvastatin in Combination with Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin Provided High Rate of Sustained Virological Response in Patients with Genotype 3 Hepatitis C Virus.阿托伐他汀联合聚乙二醇干扰素和利巴韦林治疗丙型肝炎病毒3型患者可实现高持续病毒学应答率
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 May 30;7(10):1641-1648. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.459. eCollection 2019 May 31.
10
Patients' preferences for treatment of hepatitis C.患者对丙型肝炎治疗的偏好。
Med Decis Making. 2010 Jan-Feb;30(1):45-57. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09341588. Epub 2009 Jul 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Building bridges between doctors and patients: the design and pilot evaluation of a training session in argumentation for chronic pain experts.搭建医患之间的桥梁:慢性疼痛专家论证培训课程的设计与初步评估
BMC Med Educ. 2015 May 19;15:89. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0374-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Desired and perceived participation in medical decision-making in patients with haemato-oncological diseases.血液肿瘤疾病患者对参与医疗决策的期望和感知。
Leuk Res. 2010 Mar;34(3):390-2. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2009.06.024. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
2
Veterans' decision-making preferences and perceived involvement in care for chronic heart failure.退伍军人对慢性心力衰竭护理的决策偏好及感知参与度
Heart Lung. 2008 Nov-Dec;37(6):440-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
3
Preferences for involvement in treatment decision making of patients with cancer: a review of the literature.
癌症患者参与治疗决策的偏好:文献综述
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008 Sep;12(4):299-318. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2008.03.004. Epub 2008 May 16.
4
Health-state utilities in liver disease: a systematic review.肝病中的健康状态效用:一项系统评价。
Med Decis Making. 2008 Jul-Aug;28(4):582-92. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08315240. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
5
Economics of chronic hepatitis B and hepatitis C.慢性乙型肝炎和丙型肝炎的经济学
J Hepatol. 2007 Oct;47(4):608-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.07.016. Epub 2007 Jul 30.
6
The effects of HCV infection and management on health-related quality of life.丙型肝炎病毒感染及治疗对健康相关生活质量的影响。
Hepatology. 2007 Mar;45(3):806-16. doi: 10.1002/hep.21565.
7
What do patients consider when making decisions about treatment for hepatitis C?患者在做出丙型肝炎治疗决策时会考虑哪些因素?
Am J Med. 2005 Dec;118(12):1387-91. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.05.029.
8
Involvement in treatment decisions: what do adults with asthma want and what do they get? Results of a cross sectional survey.参与治疗决策:哮喘成人患者的需求与实际情况如何?一项横断面调查结果
Thorax. 2005 Mar;60(3):199-205. doi: 10.1136/thx.2004.029041.
9
Health values of patients with chronic hepatitis C infection.慢性丙型肝炎感染患者的健康价值观。
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Nov 22;164(21):2377-82. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.21.2377.
10
Women's preferences for doctor's involvement in decisions about mammography screening.
Med Decis Making. 2004 Jul-Aug;24(4):379-85. doi: 10.1177/0272989X04267011.