Price Bethany J, Rosenbaum Alan
Northern Illinois University, IL, USA.
Violence Vict. 2009;24(6):757-70. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.24.6.757.
Over the past 25 years, batterer intervention has become the most probable disposition following a plea or conviction on domestic battery charges and, consequently, batterer intervention programs (BIPs) have proliferated. Despite their popularity, and recent attempts by states to regulate practice, little is known about the actual programs operating in the field. The aim of this study was to examine the philosophy, structure, leadership, curricula, and support systems of BIPs. Respondents from 276 batterer intervention programs in 45 states described their programs via an anonymous, Web-based survey. The results provide some insight regarding the workings of actual BIPs and also point out problems such as the dearth of programs in languages other than English and the failure to translate recommendations for prescriptive approaches into practice.
在过去25年里,针对家庭暴力犯罪者的干预措施已成为认罪或被判定有罪后最可能的处置方式,因此,家庭暴力犯罪者干预项目(BIPs)大量涌现。尽管这些项目很受欢迎,且近期各州也试图对其实施进行规范,但对于该领域实际运行的项目却知之甚少。本研究的目的是考察家庭暴力犯罪者干预项目的理念、结构、领导方式、课程设置和支持系统。来自45个州276个家庭暴力犯罪者干预项目的受访者通过一项基于网络的匿名调查对他们的项目进行了描述。研究结果为实际运行的家庭暴力犯罪者干预项目的运作提供了一些见解,同时也指出了一些问题,比如缺乏非英语语言的项目,以及未能将规定性方法的建议转化为实际行动。