Robotic surgery.
作者信息
Jones Adam, Sethia Krishna
机构信息
Urology Department, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, UK.
出版信息
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010 Jan;92(1):5-8. doi: 10.1308/003588410X12518836439362.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Robotic surgery.机器人手术
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010 Jan;92(1):5-8. doi: 10.1308/003588410X12518836439362.
2
Modifiable factors to decrease the cost of robotic-assisted procedures.降低机器人辅助手术成本的可改变因素。
AORN J. 2013 Oct;98(4):343-52. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2013.08.012.
3
Robotic prostatectomy: facts or fiction?
Lancet. 2007 Mar 3;369(9563):723-724. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60336-5.
4
Local cost structures and the economics of robot assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的局部成本结构与经济学
J Urol. 2005 Dec;174(6):2323-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000181830.43340.e7.
5
Reducing robotic prostatectomy costs by minimizing instrumentation.通过减少器械使用来降低机器人前列腺切除术的成本。
J Endourol. 2015 May;29(5):556-60. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0533. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
6
Robotic-assisted vs. open radical prostatectomy: when can we stop the debate?
Urol Oncol. 2012 Sep;30(5):549-52. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.03.003.
7
Critical comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and open radical prostatectomy: techniques, outcomes, and cost.腹腔镜、机器人辅助及开放性根治性前列腺切除术的关键比较：技术、结果与成本
Curr Urol Rep. 2006 May;7(3):193-9. doi: 10.1007/s11934-006-0021-1.
8
Critical issues in current comparative and cost analyses between retropubic and robotic radical prostatectomy.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术当前比较及成本分析中的关键问题。
BJU Int. 2008 Jan;101(1):2-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07201.x. Epub 2007 Oct 8.
9
Robotic radical retropubic prostatectomy.
BJU Int. 2003 Feb;91(3):175-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04070.x.
10
Editorial comment on: Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.关于“机器人辅助、腹腔镜及开放根治性前列腺切除术治疗前列腺癌的成本比较”的编辑评论
Eur Urol. 2010 Mar;57(3):458. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.022. Epub 2009 Nov 11.
引用本文的文献
1
Factors supporting and constraining the implementation of robot-assisted surgery: a realist interview study.支持和制约机器人辅助手术实施的因素：一项现实主义访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 14;9(6):e028635. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028635.
2
Working towards clinical effectiveness-a multi-disciplinary approach to robotic surgery.致力于临床疗效——机器人手术的多学科方法
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Mar;8(2):255-262. doi: 10.21037/acs.2019.02.01.
3
Robotic Surgery: Applications.机器人手术：应用
Am J Robot Surg. 2014 Jun 1;1(1):1-64.
4
Public perceptions on robotic surgery, hospitals with robots, and surgeons that use them.公众对机器人手术、配备机器人的医院以及使用机器人的外科医生的看法。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1310-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4368-6. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
5
Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol.机器人手术纳入常规实践及其对沟通、协作和决策的影响：一个实际过程评估方案。
Implement Sci. 2014 May 2;9:52. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-52.
6
Adverse effects of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy among a nationwide random sample of medicare-age men.在一个全国范围内的 Medicare 年龄段男性随机样本中，机器人辅助腹腔镜与开放耻骨后前列腺切除术的不良影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb 10;30(5):513-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.8621. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
本文引用的文献
1
Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.耻骨后、腹腔镜及机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术：比较研究的系统评价与累积分析
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1037-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.036. Epub 2009 Jan 25.
2
The first 1000 cases of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the UK: evidence of multiple 'learning curves'.英国首例1000例腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术：多条“学习曲线”的证据
BJU Int. 2009 May;103(9):1224-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08169.x. Epub 2008 Nov 20.
3
Direct comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of robotic-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single-surgeon experience.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与单纯腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的手术及功能结果直接比较：单术者经验
Urology. 2009 Jan;73(1):119-23. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.491. Epub 2008 Oct 26.
4
Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques.前列腺癌根治术：开放性耻骨后与机器人辅助技术的配对比较
BJU Int. 2009 Feb;103(4):448-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08012.x. Epub 2008 Sep 3.
5
Comparison of radical prostatectomy techniques: open, laparoscopic and robotic assisted.根治性前列腺切除术技术比较：开放手术、腹腔镜手术及机器人辅助手术
Int Braz J Urol. 2008 May-Jun;34(3):259-68; discussion 268-9. doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382008000300002.
6
Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.耻骨后开放性前列腺根治术或机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺根治术后的满意度与遗憾感
Eur Urol. 2008 Oct;54(4):785-93. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.06.063. Epub 2008 Jun 23.
7
Gizmo idolatry.
JAMA. 2008 Apr 16;299(15):1830-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.15.1830.
8
Trainees do not negatively impact the institutional learning curve for robotic prostatectomy as characterized by operative time, estimated blood loss, and positive surgical margin rate.学员不会对以手术时间、估计失血量和手术切缘阳性率为特征的机器人前列腺切除术的机构学习曲线产生负面影响。
Urology. 2008 Apr;71(4):597-601. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.023.
9
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: six months of fellowship training doesn't prevent the learning curve when incorporating into a lower volume practice.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术：当纳入手术量较少的临床实践时，六个月的专科培训并不能避免学习曲线。
Urol Oncol. 2009 Mar-Apr;27(2):144-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.11.030. Epub 2008 Feb 4.
10
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: ten years later, time for evidence-based foundation.
Eur Urol. 2008 Jul;54(1):4-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.02.030. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
Zotero 插件