Garbutt Anthony M
Department of Nursing, Midwifery and Health, Northumbria University, Coach Lane Campus, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK.
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Mar;8(2):255-262. doi: 10.21037/acs.2019.02.01.
The importance of a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) approach to conventional surgical techniques has strong empirical support. The MDT approach to robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has not been clearly defined, which encourages prospectively poor MDT performance. Poor performance of the MDT approach, allied to the constant evolution of technology-assisted surgery, can generate unacceptable operative and patient outcomes. This review offers a nursing perspective to the complex paradigm of thoracic RAS, demonstrating key indicators to perioperative MDT engagement. This will be achieved by offering a rationale for RAS in pulmonary resection, identifying additional surgeries where utility is demonstrated. Evaluation of the available evidence will synthesize clinical quality indicators, while key strategies in effective MDT development can be summarised. Conclusively, bespoke and experiential knowledge will be shared, based upon the investigatory findings discussed throughout this article. Allied to a recommended developmental framework, this perspective should allow for transfer of knowledge, creation and replication of useful interventions. Lung cancer is an ever-increasing global concern, currently being the co-modal cancer with an estimated 2.09 million cases worldwide. Populations are ageing and with annual global costs of at least $1.16 trillion, effective treatments are required. RAS shows promise in treating large and complex lesions when compared to a video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approach. A critical indicator being enhanced vision and dexterity in comparison to a VATS approach. Economically, RAS has proven to be an expensive technique, however, when initial purchase costs are excluded, intra-operatively, there are ways to narrow the expense gap and make RAS cheaper. When assessing per hospital stay, exclusive of initial purchase cost, RAS is found to be cheaper than open thoracotomy. This article demonstrates that RAS for pulmonary resection has utility for complex lesions where a VATS approach would be unsuitable. Crucially, as with all complex surgery, the MDT must be performed effectively for optimum patient outcomes.
多学科团队(MDT)方法应用于传统外科技术的重要性有着强有力的实证支持。然而,MDT方法应用于机器人辅助手术(RAS)的情况尚未得到明确界定,这导致MDT在未来的表现可能不佳。MDT方法表现不佳,再加上技术辅助手术的不断发展,可能会产生不可接受的手术效果和患者预后。本综述从护理角度审视了胸科RAS这一复杂模式,展示了围手术期MDT参与的关键指标。这将通过为肺切除术中的RAS提供理论依据来实现,确定已证明其效用的其他手术。对现有证据的评估将综合临床质量指标,同时可以总结有效MDT发展的关键策略。最后,将根据本文讨论的调查结果分享定制的经验性知识。结合推荐的发展框架,这一观点应有助于知识的传播、有用干预措施的创建和复制。肺癌是一个日益受到全球关注的问题,目前是共同模式癌症,全球估计有209万例病例。人口老龄化,全球每年成本至少1.16万亿美元,因此需要有效的治疗方法。与电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)相比,RAS在治疗大型和复杂病变方面显示出前景。一个关键指标是与VATS相比,视觉和灵活性得到增强。从经济角度来看,RAS已被证明是一种昂贵的技术,然而,排除初始采购成本后,在术中,有办法缩小费用差距,使RAS更便宜。在评估每次住院费用时,排除初始采购成本,发现RAS比开胸手术便宜。本文表明,用于肺切除的RAS对于VATS方法不适用的复杂病变具有效用。至关重要的是,与所有复杂手术一样,必须有效地开展MDT,以实现最佳的患者预后。