Suppr超能文献

全股骨头同种异体移植联合关节软骨用于髋关节翻修术中髋臼打压植骨的早期结果

Early results of whole femoral head allograft with articular cartilage for acetabular impaction grafting in revision hip replacements.

作者信息

Subramanian Sivaraman, Jain Kaushik D, Sreekumar Ramakutty, Fox Una, Hemmady Mukesh, Hodgkinson John

机构信息

Centre for Hip Surgery, Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, UK.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010 Jan;92(1):27-30. doi: 10.1308/003588410X12518836439966.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Extensive bone loss associated with revision hip surgery is a significant orthopaedic challenge. Acetabular reconstruction with the use of impaction bone grafting and a cemented polyethylene cup is a reliable and durable technique in revision situations with cavitatory acetabular bone defects. Some use cancellous graft alone whilst others morselise the whole femoral head after removal of articular cartilage. This paper asks, if it really necessary to use pure cancellous graft?

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-two acetabular revisions using impacted morselized bone graft without removal of articular cartilage and a cemented cup were studied retrospectively. The mean follow-up was 3 years (range, 2-5.6 years). Clinical and radiographic assessment was made using the Oxford hip score, Hodgkinson's criteria (1988) for socket loosening and the Gie classification (1993) for evaluation of allograft consolidation and remodelling.

RESULTS

Forty (95%) sockets were considered radiologically stable (type 0, 1, 2 demarcations) and two (5%) sockets were radiologically loose (Type 3 demarcation). There was no socket migration in our series. Twenty-seven(64%) cases showed good trabecular remodelling (grade 3). Twelve (29%) cases showed trabecular incorporation (grade 2). Only three (7%) cases showed poor allograft incorporation (grade 1). Average pre-operative Oxford hip score was 41 and postoperative hip score was 27. There have been no socket re-revisions (100% survival) at an average of 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Early radiological and clinical survival results with retaining articular cartilage of femoral head allografts are similar and comparable to other major studies for acetabular impaction bone grafting in revisions. Minimal loss of allograft mass is 40% in obtaining pure cancellous graft. When there is a limited supply and demand of allograft, saving up to 40% of the material is a valuable and cost-effective use of scarce resources.

摘要

引言

与髋关节翻修手术相关的广泛骨质流失是一项重大的骨科挑战。在髋臼存在空洞性骨缺损的翻修情况下,使用打压植骨和骨水泥聚乙烯杯进行髋臼重建是一种可靠且持久的技术。一些人仅使用松质骨移植,而另一些人则在去除关节软骨后将整个股骨头粉碎。本文提出疑问,真的有必要使用纯松质骨移植吗?

患者与方法

回顾性研究了42例使用未去除关节软骨的打压碎骨移植和骨水泥杯进行的髋臼翻修病例。平均随访时间为3年(范围为2至5.6年)。使用牛津髋关节评分、霍奇金森(1988年)的髋臼松动标准以及吉氏分类(1993年)对临床和影像学进行评估,以评估同种异体骨的融合和重塑情况。

结果

40个(95%)髋臼在放射学上被认为稳定(0、1、2级分界),2个(5%)髋臼在放射学上松动(3级分界)。在我们的系列病例中没有髋臼移位情况。27例(64%)显示出良好的小梁重塑(3级)。12例(29%)显示出小梁融合(2级)。只有3例(7%)显示出同种异体骨融合不良(1级)。术前平均牛津髋关节评分为41分,术后髋关节评分为27分。平均3年时没有髋臼再次翻修情况(100%生存率)。

结论

保留股骨头同种异体骨关节软骨的早期放射学和临床生存结果与其他关于髋臼打压植骨翻修的主要研究相似且具有可比性。获取纯松质骨移植时同种异体骨量的最小损失为40%。当同种异体骨供需有限时,节省高达40%的材料是对稀缺资源的一种有价值且具有成本效益的利用方式。

相似文献

3
Nine-year results of whole femoral head allograft with articular cartilage for acetabular impaction grafting in revision hip replacement.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017 Mar;99(3):203-206. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0316. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
5
[Acetabular revision for aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty using cementless cup and impacted morselized allograft].
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007 May;93(3):255-63. doi: 10.1016/s0035-1040(07)90247-0.
6
[Bone grafts in hip prosthesis revisions].
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2003;70(2):83-8.
8
Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Nov;86(11):2385-92. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200411000-00004.
9
Femoral impaction allografting for significant bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty.
Hip Int. 2017 May 12;27(3):281-285. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000438. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
10
Revision hip arthroplasty using impacted cancellous bone and cement: a long-term follow-up study.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Dec;25(8):1279-84. doi: 10.1007/s00590-015-1703-5. Epub 2015 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of retaining the femoral stem in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Feb;144(2):947-966. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05087-3. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
2
[Short- and mid-term effectiveness of impaction bone allograft with acetabular components in treatment of severe acetabular defects].
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Mar 15;34(3):341-346. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201904153.
3
Acetabular "up-and-in" defect treated with in-situ femoral head autograft technique during total hip arthroplasty.
Arthroplast Today. 2019 Aug 13;5(3):301-305. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2019.07.008. eCollection 2019 Sep.
4
Nine-year results of whole femoral head allograft with articular cartilage for acetabular impaction grafting in revision hip replacement.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017 Mar;99(3):203-206. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0316. Epub 2016 Oct 28.

本文引用的文献

2
Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Nov;86(11):2385-92. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200411000-00004.
3
Impaction bone-grafting in revision joint replacement surgery.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Sep;86(9):2050-60. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200409000-00028.
6
Stiffness and compactness of morselized grafts during impaction: an in vitro study with human femoral heads.
Acta Orthop Scand. 2001 Oct;72(5):470-6. doi: 10.1080/000164701753532790.
7
Mechanical characteristics of impacted morsellised bone grafts used in revision of total hip arthroplasty.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 Nov;81(6):1052-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.81b6.8742.
8
Mechanical considerations in impaction bone grafting.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 Jan;81(1):118-24. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.81b1.8480.
9
Supply and demand of bone allograft for revision hip surgery in Scotland.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998 Jul;80(4):595-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b4.8240.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验