• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋臼组件打压植骨治疗严重髋臼缺损的短期和中期疗效

[Short- and mid-term effectiveness of impaction bone allograft with acetabular components in treatment of severe acetabular defects].

作者信息

Chen Leilei, Hong Guoju, Lin Tianye, Huang Linfeng, Zhang Qingwen, He Wei

机构信息

Third Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou Guangdong, 510405, P.R.China;The Lab of Orthopaedics and Traumatology of Chinese Medicine of Lingnan Medical Research Center, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou Guangdong, 510405, P.R.China.

The Lab of Orthopaedics and Traumatology of Chinese Medicine of Lingnan Medical Research Center, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou Guangdong, 510405, P.R.China;The First Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou Guangdong, 510405, P.R.China;Devision of Orthopeadic Surgery, the University of Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Mar 15;34(3):341-346. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201904153.

DOI:10.7507/1002-1892.201904153
PMID:32174080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8171646/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the short- and mid-term effectiveness of revision hip arthroplasty by using impaction bone allograft and acetabular components in treatment of severe acetabular defects.

METHODS

A clinical data of 42 patients (44 hips) with severe acetabular defects between February 2011 and May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent revision hip arthroplasty by using impaction bone allograft and acetabular components. Cemented cup (24 cases, 24 hips) and non-cemented cup (18 cases, 20 hips) were used in the revision surgery. There were 17 males and 25 females with an average age of 62.8 years (range, 22-84 years). The interval between the first total hip arthroplasty and revision was 2.5-12.0 years (mean, 8.3 years). The patients were accepted revision surgery for prosthesis aseptic loosening in 32 hips (31 cases) and the periprosthetic infection in 12 hips (11 cases). Twenty-nine hips (28 cases) were Paprosky type ⅢA and 15 hips (14 cases) were type ⅢB. The preoperative Harris score was 22.25±10.31 and the height of hip rotation center was (3.67±0.63) cm and the length difference of lower limbs was (3.41±0.64) cm.

RESULTS

The operation time was 130-245 minutes (mean, 186 minutes) and the intraoperative blood loss was 600-2 400 mL (mean, 840 mL). The postoperative drainage volume was 250-1 450 mL (mean, 556 mL). Superficial infection of the incision occurred in 1 case, and the incisions healed by first intention in the other patients. All patients were followed up 6-87 months, with an average of 48.6 months. At last follow-up, the Harris score was 85.85±9.31, which was significantly different from the preoperative score ( =18.563, =0.000). Imaging examination revealed that the allogeneic bone gradually fused with the host bone, and no obvious bone resorption was observed. At last follow-up, the height of the hip rotation center was (1.01±0.21) cm, which was significantly different from the preoperative level ( =17.549, =0.000); the length difference of lower limbs was (0.62±0.51) cm, which was significantly different from the preoperative level ( =14.211, =0.000). The Harris score in the cemented group and non-cemented group increased significantly at last follow-up. The height of the hip rotation center decreased, and the hip rotation centers of both groups were within the Ranawat triangle zone. The length difference of the lower limbs also decreased, and the differences in all indexes were significant between pre- and post-operation ( <0.05). There was significant difference in the height of the hip rotation center between groups ( =2.095, =0.042), but there was no significant difference in the Harris score and the length difference of lower limbs between groups ( >0.05).

CONCLUSION

For severe acetabular defect (Paprosky type Ⅲ), the hip can be reconstructed with the impaction bone allograft and cemented or non-cemented components in revision hip arthroplsty. The short- and mid-term effectiveness are satisfactory.

摘要

目的

探讨采用打压植骨和髋臼假体翻修髋关节置换术治疗严重髋臼骨缺损的中短期疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2011年2月至2018年5月期间42例(44髋)严重髋臼骨缺损患者的临床资料。所有患者均采用打压植骨和髋臼假体行髋关节翻修术。翻修手术中使用骨水泥型髋臼杯(24例,24髋)和非骨水泥型髋臼杯(18例,20髋)。患者中男性17例,女性25例,平均年龄62.8岁(范围22 - 84岁)。首次全髋关节置换术至翻修的间隔时间为2.5 - 12.0年(平均8.3年)。32髋(31例)因假体无菌性松动接受翻修手术,12髋(11例)因假体周围感染接受翻修手术。29髋(28例)为PaproskyⅢA型,15髋(14例)为ⅢB型。术前Harris评分为22.25±10.31,髋关节旋转中心高度为(3.67±0.63)cm,双下肢长度差为(3.41±0.64)cm。

结果

手术时间为130 - 245分钟(平均186分钟),术中出血量为600 - 2400 mL(平均840 mL)。术后引流量为250 - 1450 mL(平均556 mL)。切口发生浅表感染1例,其余患者切口均一期愈合。所有患者均获随访6 - 87个月,平均48.6个月。末次随访时,Harris评分为85.85±9.31,与术前评分相比差异有统计学意义(t = 18.563,P = 0.000)。影像学检查显示异体骨与宿主骨逐渐融合,未观察到明显的骨吸收。末次随访时,髋关节旋转中心高度为(1.01±0.21)cm,与术前水平相比差异有统计学意义(t = 17.549,P = 0.000);双下肢长度差为(0.62±0.51)cm,与术前水平相比差异有统计学意义(t = 14.211,P = 0.000)。末次随访时骨水泥组和非骨水泥组Harris评分均显著提高。髋关节旋转中心高度降低,两组髋关节旋转中心均位于Ranawat三角区内。双下肢长度差也减小,所有指标术前与术后比较差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组间髋关节旋转中心高度差异有统计学意义(t = 2.095,P = 0.042),但两组间Harris评分及双下肢长度差差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。

结论

对于严重髋臼骨缺损(PaproskyⅢ型),髋关节翻修术中采用打压植骨联合骨水泥型或非骨水泥型假体可重建髋关节,中短期疗效满意。

相似文献

1
[Short- and mid-term effectiveness of impaction bone allograft with acetabular components in treatment of severe acetabular defects].髋臼组件打压植骨治疗严重髋臼缺损的短期和中期疗效
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Mar 15;34(3):341-346. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201904153.
2
[The reconstruction techniques and mid-term clinical outcomes of hip revision for acetabular bone defect after total hip arthroplasty].[全髋关节置换术后髋臼骨缺损翻修的重建技术及中期临床疗效]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Sep 1;62(9):836-846. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20240514-00243.
3
THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.使用带网塞骨移植术进行全髋关节翻修术对髋臼内侧缺损有效,但对髋臼外侧缺损效果不佳。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3882-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4483-7.
4
[Acetabular revision for aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty using cementless cup and impacted morselized allograft].[采用非骨水泥髋臼杯及打压植骨异体碎骨块进行全髋关节置换术中无菌性松动的髋臼翻修术]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007 May;93(3):255-63. doi: 10.1016/s0035-1040(07)90247-0.
5
[Short-term effectiveness of acetabular reconstruction with three-dimensional printed trabecular metal pads in hip revision].三维打印小梁金属垫块在髋关节翻修术中髋臼重建的短期疗效
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 15;33(12):1516-1520. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201905010.
6
Impaction bone grafting in hip re-revision surgery.髋关节翻修术中的嵌压植骨。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Mar;103-B(3):492-499. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B3.BJJ-2020-1228.R1.
7
Mid- to Long-term Follow-up of Severe Acetabular Bone Defect after Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Impaction Bone Grafting and Metal Mesh.翻修全髋关节置换术后严重髋臼骨缺损采用打压植骨和金属网的中远期随访
Orthop Surg. 2023 Mar;15(3):750-757. doi: 10.1111/os.13651. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
8
The mid-long term results of reconstructional cage and morselized allografts combined application for the Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty.翻修髋关节置换术中重建性骨笼和颗粒同种异体移植物联合应用治疗 Paprosky Ⅲ型髋臼骨缺损的中远期疗效。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Nov 7;20(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2915-3.
9
Impaction Bone Grafting with Low Dose Irradiated Freeze-Dried Allograft Bone for Acetabular Reconstruction.髋臼重建中采用低剂量辐照冻干同种异体骨移植治疗骨嵌塞。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Oct;14(10):2519-2526. doi: 10.1111/os.13471. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
10
Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old.50岁以下患者采用打压植骨和骨水泥杯进行髋臼重建。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Nov;86(11):2385-92. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200411000-00004.

引用本文的文献

1
Impaction Bone Grafting Combined with Titanium Mesh for Acetabular Bone Defects Reconstruction in Total Hip Arthroplasty Revision: A Retrospective and Mini-Review Study.髋关节翻修术中应用嵌压植骨联合钛网重建髋臼骨缺损:回顾性迷你研究。
Orthop Surg. 2022 May;14(5):902-910. doi: 10.1111/os.13262. Epub 2022 Apr 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Acetabular Cup Revision.髋臼杯翻修术
Hip Pelvis. 2017 Sep;29(3):155-158. doi: 10.5371/hp.2017.29.3.155. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
2
Reconstruction of non-contained acetabular defects with impaction grafting, a reinforcement mesh and a cemented polyethylene acetabular component.采用打压植骨、加强网和骨水泥固定的聚乙烯髋臼部件重建非包容性髋臼缺损。
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jan;99-B(1 Supple A):25-30. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0322.R1.
3
Favorable Early Results of Impaction Bone Grafting With Reinforcement Mesh for the Treatment of Paprosky 3B Acetabular Defects.使用加强网进行打压植骨治疗Paprosky 3B型髋臼缺损的早期良好结果
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):919-923. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.037. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
4
Nine-year results of whole femoral head allograft with articular cartilage for acetabular impaction grafting in revision hip replacement.全股骨头同种异体移植联合关节软骨用于髋关节翻修术中髋臼打压植骨的九年随访结果
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017 Mar;99(3):203-206. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0316. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
5
Long-term clinical outcome of acetabular cup revision surgery: comparison of cemented cups, cementless cups, and cemented cups with reinforcement devices.髋臼杯翻修手术的长期临床结果:骨水泥型髋臼杯、非骨水泥型髋臼杯以及带加强装置的骨水泥型髋臼杯的比较
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016 May;26(4):407-13. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1763-1. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
6
THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.使用带网塞骨移植术进行全髋关节翻修术对髋臼内侧缺损有效,但对髋臼外侧缺损效果不佳。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3882-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4483-7.
7
The biological approach in acetabular revision surgery: impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup.髋臼翻修手术中的生物学方法:打压植骨与骨水泥杯
Hip Int. 2015 Jul-Aug;25(4):361-7. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000267. Epub 2015 May 20.
8
Fate of bone grafting for acetabular defects in total hip replacement.全髋关节置换术中髋臼缺损骨移植的转归
Indian J Orthop. 2015 Mar-Apr;49(2):181-6. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.152462.
9
Bone graft substitute: allograft and xenograft.骨移植替代物:同种异体移植和异种移植。
Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2015 Jan;32(1):21-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cpm.2014.09.011.
10
Classifications in brief: Paprosky classification of acetabular bone loss.简要分类:髋臼骨缺损的帕罗斯基分类法。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Nov;471(11):3725-30. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3264-4. Epub 2013 Aug 31.