Grimes Caris, Chin Diana, Bailey Catherine, Gergely Szabolcs, Harris Adrian
Department of Laparoscopic Surgery, Hinchingbrooke Hospital, Huntingdon, UK.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010 Jan;92(1):61-4. doi: 10.1308/003588410X12518836439524.
There is debate over whether a normal-looking appendix should be removed at diagnostic laparoscopy performed for right iliac fossa (RIF) pain. Faecaliths are associated with appendicitis. This study assessed whether there was an association between the removal of normal appendices containing faecaliths and improvement of symptoms.
Analysis of the histology database for all appendicectomies during 2003-2007 with normal histology, noting presence of a faecalith. Retrospective study using a telephone questionnaire for frequency/duration of pre-operative symptoms, postoperative symptom recurrence, re-admission rates and complications. The faecalith-positive (f(+)) group was compared to a similar control group of patients who had a normal appendix removed which did not contain a faecalith (f(-)). RESULTS Out of 203 appendicectomies performed with normal histology, 26 (13%) were f(+). Of these, 21 responded to the questionnaire. Thirty-one consecutive patients with normal histology and no faecalith were identified. A similar proportion in each group presented with three or more episodes of pain prior to appendicectomy (38% f(+); 39% control). Only one (5%) of the f(+) patients had recurring symptoms after the operation, compared with 14 (48%) of the control group (P = 0.0016). Only one (5%) of the f(+) patients underwent further investigations, compared with 11 (36%) of the control group (P < 0.02). None of the f(+) patients were re-admitted, compared to 19% of the control population. There were no significant postoperative complications in either group.
Appendiceal faecaliths may be a cause of right iliac fossa pain in the absence of obvious appendiceal inflammation. In this study, the policy of routine removal of a normal-looking appendix at laparoscopy in the absence of any other obvious pathology appeared to be an effective treatment for recurrent symptoms in those cases with a faecalith. Further studies are needed to assess this putative association.
对于因右下腹(RIF)疼痛而行诊断性腹腔镜检查时,外观正常的阑尾是否应予以切除存在争议。粪石与阑尾炎相关。本研究评估了切除含有粪石的正常阑尾与症状改善之间是否存在关联。
分析2003年至2007年间所有组织学正常的阑尾切除术的组织学数据库,记录粪石的存在情况。采用电话问卷进行回顾性研究,了解术前症状的频率/持续时间、术后症状复发情况、再次入院率及并发症。将粪石阳性(f(+))组与切除了不含粪石的正常阑尾的类似对照组(f(-))进行比较。结果在203例组织学正常的阑尾切除术中,26例(13%)为f(+)。其中21例回复了问卷。确定了31例连续的组织学正常且无粪石的患者。每组中相似比例的患者在阑尾切除术前出现三次或更多次疼痛发作(f(+)组为38%;对照组为39%)。f(+)组患者术后仅有1例(5%)出现症状复发,而对照组为14例(48%)(P = 0.0016)。f(+)组患者仅有1例(5%)接受了进一步检查,而对照组为11例(36%)(P < 0.02)。f(+)组患者均未再次入院,而对照组的再次入院率为19%。两组术后均无显著并发症。
阑尾粪石可能是在无明显阑尾炎症情况下右下腹疼痛的一个原因。在本研究中,在无任何其他明显病变时,腹腔镜下常规切除外观正常的阑尾这一策略似乎是治疗那些有粪石病例中复发性症状的有效方法。需要进一步研究来评估这种假定的关联。