Radboud University Nijmegen, Behavioural Science Institute, The Netherlands.
Behav Res Ther. 2010 Apr;48(4):312-20. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.12.003. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
To investigate when and why therapists opt for or rule out imaginal exposure (IE) for patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), 255 trauma experts were randomized to two conditions in which they were presented with four cases in which the patients' comorbidity and treatment preferences were manipulated. The results confirmed IE to be an underutilized approach, with the majority of professionals being undertrained in the technique. As predicted, the patient factors influenced the expert's choice of therapy: in case of a comorbid depression, IE was significantly less preferred than medication. Also, IE was significantly more likely to be offered when patients expressed a preference for trauma-focused treatment. The therapist factors were also found to be importantly related to treatment preferences, with high credibility in the technique being positively related to the therapists' preference for IE. Perceived barriers to IE, such as a fear of symptom exacerbation and dropout, were negatively related to the perceived suitability of the treatment when patients had suffered multiple traumas in childhood. The results are discussed in the light of clinical implications and the need of exposure training for trauma professionals.
为了探究治疗师何时以及为何选择或排除创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者的想象暴露(IE),255 名创伤专家被随机分为两种情况,他们分别阅读了四个案例,这些案例中患者的合并症和治疗偏好被操纵。结果证实,IE 是一种未被充分利用的方法,大多数专业人员在该技术方面的培训不足。正如预测的那样,患者因素影响了专家对治疗的选择:在合并抑郁的情况下,与药物治疗相比,IE 的选择明显减少。而且,当患者表示更倾向于创伤聚焦治疗时,IE 更有可能被提供。还发现治疗师因素与治疗偏好密切相关,对技术的高度信任与治疗师对 IE 的偏好呈正相关。当患者在儿童时期遭受多次创伤时,对 IE 的恐惧和脱落等感知障碍与治疗的适用性呈负相关。结果根据临床意义和创伤专业人员暴露训练的需要进行了讨论。