Institut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Strasbourg, France.
Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Eur J Pain. 2010 Aug;14(7):700-704. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.11.014. Epub 2009 Dec 28.
Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are among the first line treatments clinically recommended against neuropathic pain. However, the mechanism by which they alleviate pain is still unclear. Pharmacological and genetic approaches evidenced a critical role of delta-opioid receptors (DORs) in the therapeutic action of chronic TCA treatment. It is however unclear whether mu-opioid receptors (MORs) are also necessary to the pain-relieving action of TCAs. The lack of highly selective MOR antagonists makes difficult to conclude based on pharmacological studies. In the present work, we thus used a genetic approach and compared mutant mice lacking MORs and their wild-type littermates. The neuropathy was induced by unilateral sciatic nerve cuffing. The threshold for mechanical response was evaluated using von Frey filaments. MOR-deficient mice displayed the same baseline for mechanical sensitivity as their wild-type littermates. After sciatic nerve cuffing, both wild-type and MOR-deficient mice displayed an ipsilateral mechanical allodynia. After about 10 days of treatment, nortriptyline suppressed this allodynia in both wild-type and MOR-deficient mice. MORs are thus not critical for nortriptyline action against neuropathic pain. An acute injection of the DOR antagonist naltrindole induced a relapse of neuropathic allodynia in both wild-type and MOR-deficient mice, thus confirming the critical role of DORs in nortriptyline action. Moreover, morphine induced an acute analgesia in control and in neuropathic wild-type mice, but was without effect in MOR-deficient mice. While MORs are crucial for morphine action, they are not critical for nortriptyline action. Our results highlight the functional difference between DORs and MORs in mechanisms of pain relief.
三环类抗抑郁药(TCAs)是临床推荐用于治疗神经性疼痛的一线药物。然而,它们缓解疼痛的机制仍不清楚。药理学和遗传学方法表明,δ-阿片受体(DORs)在慢性 TCA 治疗的治疗作用中起着关键作用。然而,μ-阿片受体(MORs)是否对 TCA 的止痛作用也是必要的尚不清楚。缺乏高度选择性的 MOR 拮抗剂使得基于药理学研究难以得出结论。在本工作中,我们因此使用了一种遗传方法,比较了缺乏 MOR 的突变小鼠及其野生型同窝仔鼠。通过单侧坐骨神经套扎诱导神经病。使用 von Frey 纤维评估机械反应阈值。MOR 缺陷小鼠的机械敏感性基线与野生型同窝仔鼠相同。坐骨神经套扎后,野生型和 MOR 缺陷型小鼠均表现出同侧机械性痛觉过敏。经过约 10 天的治疗,去甲替林抑制了野生型和 MOR 缺陷型小鼠的这种痛觉过敏。因此,MOR 对于去甲替林治疗神经性疼痛不是关键的。DOR 拮抗剂纳曲吲哚的急性注射会导致野生型和 MOR 缺陷型小鼠的神经性痛觉过敏复发,从而证实了 DORs 在去甲替林作用中的关键作用。此外,吗啡在对照和神经性野生型小鼠中引起急性镇痛,但在 MOR 缺陷型小鼠中无效。虽然 MOR 对于吗啡的作用至关重要,但对于去甲替林的作用则不是必需的。我们的结果强调了 DORs 和 MORs 在缓解疼痛机制中的功能差异。