Department of Environmental Epidemiology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Yahatanishiku, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Environ Health Perspect. 2010 Jan;118(1):116-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901196.
National disparities in asbestos use will likely lead to an unequal burden of asbestos diseases.
As economic status may be linked to asbestos use, we assessed, globally, the relationship between indicators of national economic development and asbestos use.
For the 135 countries that have ever used asbestos, per capita asbestos use (kilograms per capita per year) was compared with per capita gross domestic product (GDP) in 1990 Geary-Khamis dollars (GKD) for the period 1920-2003. Countries were grouped into three income levels (high, middle, and low) that were adapted from the 2003 World Bank categories.
The historical pattern of asbestos use followed the environmental Kuznets curve in which use by high-income countries peaked when incomes attained 10,000-15,000 GKD and essentially ceased at income levels over 20,000 GKD. Currently, middle- and low-income countries are increasing their use of asbestos, closely following the paths once traced by higher income countries.
Developing countries have the opportunity to eliminate asbestos use sooner than high-income countries and thus reduce the future burden of asbestos diseases.
各国在石棉使用方面的差异可能导致石棉相关疾病负担的不平等。
由于经济状况可能与石棉的使用有关,我们评估了全球范围内国家经济发展指标与石棉使用之间的关系。
对于曾经使用过石棉的 135 个国家,我们将 1920 年至 2003 年期间的人均石棉使用量(每年每人为公斤)与 1990 年基尼-哈米斯美元(GKD)的人均国内生产总值(GDP)进行了比较。国家被分为三个收入水平(高、中、低),这是根据 2003 年世界银行的类别改编的。
石棉使用的历史模式遵循环境库兹涅茨曲线,高收入国家的使用在收入达到 10,000-15,000 GKD 时达到峰值,并且在收入水平超过 20,000 GKD 时基本停止。目前,中低收入国家正在增加石棉的使用,这与高收入国家曾经走过的道路密切相关。
发展中国家有机会比高收入国家更早地淘汰石棉的使用,从而减轻未来石棉相关疾病的负担。