Department of Environmental Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Japan.
Department of Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Persahabatan Hospital, Indonesia.
Ind Health. 2024 Apr 3;62(2):143-152. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2023-0010. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
This study examined physicians' participation and performance in the examinations administered by the Asian Intensive Reader of Pneumoconiosis (AIR Pneumo) program from 2008 to 2020 and compared radiograph readings of physicians who passed with those who failed the examinations. Demography of the participants, participation trends, pass/fail rates, and proficiency scores were summarized; differences in reading the radiographs for pneumoconiosis of physicians who passed the examinations and those who failed were evaluated. By December 2020, 555 physicians from 20 countries had taken certification examinations; the number of participants increased in recent years. Reported background specialty training and work experience varied widely. Passing rate and mean proficiency score for participants who passed were 83.4% and 77.6 ± 9.4 in certification, and 76.8% and 88.1 ± 4.5 in recertification examinations. Compared with physicians who passed the examinations, physicians who failed tended to classify test radiographs as positive for pneumoconiosis and read a higher profusion; they likely missed large opacities and pleural plaques and had a lower accuracy in recognizing the shape of small opacities. Findings suggest that physicians who failed the examination tend to over-diagnose radiographs as positive for pneumoconiosis with higher profusion and have difficulty in correctly identifying small opacity shape.
本研究考察了 2008 年至 2020 年期间亚洲尘肺病密集读片计划(AIR Pneumo)项目中医生的参与情况和考试表现,并比较了通过和未通过考试的医生的胸片读片结果。总结了参与者的人口统计学资料、参与趋势、通过/失败率和熟练程度评分;评估了通过和未通过考试的医生在尘肺病读片方面的差异。截至 2020 年 12 月,来自 20 个国家的 555 名医生参加了认证考试;近年来参与者人数有所增加。报告的背景专业培训和工作经验差异很大。通过考试的参与者的通过率和平均熟练程度评分为 83.4%和 77.6±9.4 分,重新认证考试的通过率和平均熟练程度评分为 76.8%和 88.1±4.5 分。与通过考试的医生相比,未通过考试的医生更倾向于将测试胸片分类为尘肺病阳性,并读取更高的密集度;他们可能会错过大的不透明度和胸膜斑,并在识别小不透明度的形状方面准确性较低。研究结果表明,未通过考试的医生倾向于过度诊断为尘肺病阳性,并具有更高的密集度,且难以正确识别小不透明度的形状。