Suppr超能文献

平衡障碍作为功能健全的社区居住老年人跌倒的风险因素:一项前瞻性研究。

Balance impairment as a risk factor for falls in community-dwelling older adults who are high functioning: a prospective study.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, Parkwood Hospital, Room A-283, 801 Commissioners Rd East, London, Ontario N6C5J1, Canada.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 2010 Mar;90(3):338-47. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090163. Epub 2010 Jan 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Screening should have simple and easy-to-administer methods that identify impairments associated with future fall risk, but there is a lack of literature supporting validation for their use.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the independent contribution of balance assessment on future fall risk, using 5 methods to quantify balance impairment, for the outcomes "any fall" and "any injurious fall" in community-dwelling older adults who are higher functioning.

DESIGN

This was a prospective cohort study.

METHODS

A sample of 210 community-dwelling older adults (70% male, 30% female; mean age=79.9 years, SD=4.7) received a comprehensive geriatric assessment at baseline, which included the Berg Balance Scale to measure balance. Information on daily falls was collected for 12 months by each participant's monthly submission of a falls log calendar.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight people (43%) fell, of whom 54 (30%) sustained an injurious fall and 32 (18%) had recurrent falls (> or =2 falls). Different balance measurement methods identified different numbers of people as impaired. Adjusted relative risk (RR) estimates for an increased risk of any fall were 1.58 (95% confidence interval [CI]=1.06, 2.35) for self-report of balance problems, 1.58 (95% CI=1.03, 2.41) for one-leg stance, and 1.46 (95% CI=1.02, 2.09) for limits of stability. An adjusted RR estimate for an increased risk of an injurious fall of 1.95 (95% CI=1.15, 3.31) was found for self-report of balance problems. Limitations The study was a secondary analysis of data.

CONCLUSIONS

Not all methods of evaluating balance impairment are associated with falls. The number of people identified as having balance impairment varies with the measurement tool; therefore, the measurement tools are not interchangeable or equivalent in defining an at-risk population. The thresholds established in this study indicate individuals who should receive further comprehensive fall assessment and treatment to prevent falls.

摘要

背景

筛选应采用简单易行的方法,识别与未来跌倒风险相关的障碍,但缺乏支持其使用的验证文献。

目的

本研究旨在评估使用 5 种平衡损伤量化方法对未来跌倒风险的独立贡献,这些方法用于评估功能较高的社区居住老年人的“任何跌倒”和“任何伤害性跌倒”结局。

设计

这是一项前瞻性队列研究。

方法

共纳入 210 名社区居住的老年人(70%为男性,30%为女性;平均年龄=79.9 岁,标准差=4.7),在基线时接受了全面的老年评估,其中包括 Berg 平衡量表来测量平衡。每位参与者每月提交一份跌倒日志日历,以收集 12 个月的日常跌倒信息。

结果

78 人(43%)跌倒,其中 54 人(30%)跌倒受伤,32 人(18%)有复发性跌倒(≥2 次跌倒)。不同的平衡测量方法识别出不同数量的损伤人群。任何跌倒风险增加的校正相对风险(RR)估计值分别为:自我报告的平衡问题为 1.58(95%置信区间[CI]=1.06,2.35),单腿站立为 1.58(95%CI=1.03,2.41),平衡极限为 1.46(95%CI=1.02,2.09)。自我报告的平衡问题与伤害性跌倒风险增加的校正 RR 估计值为 1.95(95%CI=1.15,3.31)。

局限性

本研究为数据的二次分析。

结论

并非所有评估平衡损伤的方法都与跌倒相关。被识别为有平衡损伤的人数因测量工具而异;因此,这些测量工具在定义高危人群方面不是可互换或等效的。本研究确定的阈值表明,应进一步对这些个体进行全面的跌倒评估和治疗,以预防跌倒。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验