Suppr超能文献

急性缺血性脑卒中发病时接受抗血小板治疗患者的静脉溶栓治疗安全性。

Safety of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy at stroke onset.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Stroke. 2010 Feb;41(2):288-94. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.559724. Epub 2010 Jan 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Antiplatelets (APs) may increase the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) following intravenous thrombolysis after ischemic stroke.

METHODS

We assessed the safety of thrombolysis under APs in 11,865 patients compliant with the European license criteria and recorded between 2002 and 2007 in the Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke (SITS) International Stroke Thrombolysis Register (SITS-ISTR). Outcome measures of univariable and multivariable analyses included symptomatic ICH (SICH) per SITS Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST [deterioration in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale >or=4 plus ICH type 2 within 24 hours]), per European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study II (ECASS II [deterioration in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale >or=4 plus any ICH]), functional outcome at 3 months and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 3782 (31.9%) patients had received 1 or 2 AP drugs at baseline: 3016 (25.4%) acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), 243 (2.0%) clopidogrel, 175 (1.5%) ASA and dipyridamole, 151 (1.3%) ASA and clopidogrel, and 197 (1.7%) others. Patients receiving APs were 5 years older and had more risk factors than AP naïve patients. Incidences of SICH per SITS-MOST (ECASS II respectively) were as follows: 1.1% (4.1%) AP naïve, 2.5% (6.2%) any AP, 2.5% (5.9%) ASA, 1.7% (4.2%) clopidogrel, 2.3% (5.9%) ASA and dipyridamole, and 4.1% (13.4%) ASA and clopidogrel. In multivariable analyses, the combination of ASA and clopidogrel was associated with increased risk for SICH per ECASS II (odds ratio, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.29 to 3.45; P=0.003). However, we found no significant increase in the risk for mortality or poor functional outcome, irrespective of the AP subgroup or SICH definition.

CONCLUSIONS

The absolute excess of SICH of 1.4% (2.1%) in the pooled AP group is small compared with the benefit of thrombolysis seen in randomized trials. Although caution is warranted in patients receiving the combination of ASA and clopidogrel, AP treatment should not be considered a contraindication to thrombolysis.

摘要

背景与目的

抗血小板药物(APs)可能会增加缺血性卒中静脉溶栓后症状性颅内出血(ICH)的风险。

方法

我们评估了 11865 名符合欧洲许可标准的患者在 APs 下接受溶栓治疗的安全性,并在 2002 年至 2007 年期间记录在 Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke(SITS)国际卒中溶栓登记处(SITS-ISTR)中。单变量和多变量分析的结局指标包括症状性 ICH(SICH)根据 SITS 监测研究(SITS-MOST [国立卫生研究院卒中量表恶化>4 分+24 小时内 ICH 类型 2]),根据欧洲合作急性卒中研究 II(ECASS II [国立卫生研究院卒中量表恶化>4 分+任何 ICH]),3 个月时的功能结局和死亡率。

结果

共有 3782 名(31.9%)患者在基线时接受了 1 种或 2 种 AP 药物:3016 名(25.4%)乙酰水杨酸(ASA),243 名(2.0%)氯吡格雷,175 名(1.5%)ASA 和双嘧达莫,151 名(1.3%)ASA 和氯吡格雷,197 名(1.7%)其他。与 AP 未使用者相比,接受 AP 治疗的患者年龄大 5 岁,且有更多的危险因素。根据 SITS-MOST(ECASS II),SICH 的发生率如下:1.1%(4.1%)AP 未使用者,2.5%(6.2%)任何 AP,2.5%(5.9%)ASA,1.7%(4.2%)氯吡格雷,2.3%(5.9%)ASA 和双嘧达莫,4.1%(13.4%)ASA 和氯吡格雷。在多变量分析中,ASA 和氯吡格雷联合使用与 ECASS II 定义的 SICH 风险增加相关(比值比,2.11;95%置信区间,1.29 至 3.45;P=0.003)。然而,无论 AP 亚组或 SICH 定义如何,我们都没有发现死亡率或预后不良功能结局风险增加的显著证据。

结论

与随机试验中观察到的溶栓益处相比,AP 组的 SICH 绝对增加 1.4%(2.1%)很小。尽管在接受 ASA 和氯吡格雷联合治疗的患者中需要谨慎,但 AP 治疗不应被视为溶栓的禁忌症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验