Schaefer Jan Hendrik, Lieschke Franziska, Urban Hans, Bohmann Ferdinand O, Gatzke Florian, Miesbach Wolfgang
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Department of Internal Medicine II, Haemostaseology and Haemophilia Centre, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Front Neurol. 2024 Feb 12;15:1361751. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1361751. eCollection 2024.
The clinical course of ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes can be influenced by the coagulation status of individual patients. The prior use of antiplatelet therapy (APT) such as acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) or P2Y12-antagonists has been inconsistently described as possibly increasing the risk of hemorrhagic transformation or expansion. Since clinical studies describing prior use of antiplatelet medication are overwhelmingly lacking specific functional tests, we aimed to implement testing in routine stroke care.
We used fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) with antibodies against CD61 for thrombocyte identification and CD62p or platelet activation complex-1 (PAC-1) to determine platelet activation. Aggregometry and automated platelet functioning analyzer (PFA-200) were employed to test thrombocyte reactivity. FACS and aggregometry samples were stimulated with arachidonic acid (AA) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) to measure increase in CD62p-/PAC-1-expression or aggregation, respectively.
Between February and July 2023, 20 blood samples ( = 11 ischemic strokes; = 7 hemorrhagic strokes; = 2 controls) were acquired and analyzed within 24 h of symptom onset. = 11 patients had taken ASA, = 8 patients no APT and = 1 ASA+clopidogrel. ASA intake compared to no APT was associated with lower CD62p expression after stimulation with AA on FACS analysis (median 15.8% [interquartile range {IQR} 12.6-37.2%] vs. 40.1% [IQR 20.3-56.3%]; = 0.020), lower platelet aggregation (9.0% [IQR 7.0-12.0%] vs. 88.5% [IQR 11.8-92.0%]; = 0.015) and longer time to plug formation with PFA-200 (248.0 s [IQR 157.0-297] vs. 121.5 s [IQR 99.8-174.3]; = 0.027). Significant correlations were noted between AA-induced CD62p expression and aggregometry analysis ( = 18; ρ = 0.714; < 0.001) as well as a negative correlation between CD62p increase and PFA clot formation time ( = 18; ρ = -0.613; = 0.007). Sensitivity for ASA intake was highest for PFA (81.8% for values ≥155.5 s). The combination of ASA + clopidogrel also affected ADP-induced CD62p and PAC-1 expression.
In the clinical setting it is feasible to use differentiated platelet analytics to determine alterations caused by antiplatelet therapy. Among the tests under investigation, PFA-200 showed the highest sensitivity for the intake of ASA in stroke patients. FACS analysis on the other hand might be able to provide a more nuanced approach to altered platelet reactivity.
缺血性和出血性中风的临床病程可能受个体患者凝血状态的影响。先前使用抗血小板治疗(APT),如阿司匹林(ASA)或P2Y12拮抗剂,被不一致地描述为可能增加出血性转化或扩大的风险。由于描述先前使用抗血小板药物的临床研究绝大多数缺乏特定的功能测试,我们旨在在常规中风护理中开展检测。
我们使用荧光激活细胞分选术(FACS),用抗CD61抗体识别血小板,用抗CD62p或血小板激活复合物-1(PAC-1)抗体测定血小板活化。采用血小板聚集试验和自动血小板功能分析仪(PFA-200)检测血小板反应性。FACS和血小板聚集试验样本分别用花生四烯酸(AA)和二磷酸腺苷(ADP)刺激,以测量CD62p-/PAC-1表达增加或聚集情况。
在2023年2月至7月期间,在症状发作后24小时内采集并分析了20份血液样本(n = 11例缺血性中风;n = 7例出血性中风;n = 2例对照)。11例患者服用了ASA,8例患者未接受APT,1例患者服用了ASA + 氯吡格雷。FACS分析显示,与未接受APT相比,服用ASA的患者在AA刺激后CD62p表达较低(中位数15.8% [四分位间距{IQR} 12.6 - 37.2%] 对40.1% [IQR 20.3 - 56.3%];P = 0.020),血小板聚集较低(9.0% [IQR 7.0 - 12.0%] 对88.5% [IQR 11.8 - 92.0%];P = 0.015),PFA-200检测的血栓形成时间较长(248.0秒 [IQR 157.0 - 297] 对121.5秒 [IQR 99.8 - 174.3];P = 0.027)。AA诱导的CD62p表达与血小板聚集试验分析之间存在显著相关性(n = 18;ρ = 0.714;P < 0.001),CD62p增加与PFA血栓形成时间之间存在负相关性(n = 18;ρ = -0.613;P = 0.007)。PFA对ASA摄入的敏感性最高(值≥155.5秒时为81.8%)。ASA + 氯吡格雷的联合用药也影响ADP诱导的CD62p和PAC-1表达。
在临床环境中,使用差异化的血小板分析来确定抗血小板治疗引起的改变是可行的。在所研究的检测方法中,PFA-200对中风患者服用ASA显示出最高的敏感性。另一方面,FACS分析可能能够为血小板反应性改变提供更细致入微的方法。