Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, Lancashire, UK.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010 Oct;15(4):547-58. doi: 10.1007/s10459-009-9217-8. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
Doctors in specialist training posts in the Mersey Deanery are expected to reflect on their clinical practice and to document their learning experiences in an e-portfolio. This study aims specifically to explore how they have engaged in reflection on their practice and how they utilise their learning portfolio to document evidence of this. A modified Delphi technique was used to develop a grading system to identify the level of reflection recorded by participants in the e-portfolio. Transcripts of the reflective accounts were then analysed using a qualitative approach which involved coding and categorising the data. This study demonstrated a wide variation in both the quantity and quality of reflection. Of particular note in the qualitative data analysis were themes relating to clinical knowledge and skills, learning in practice, communication, feelings, types of learning experience reflected on and wider aspects of medical practice. Findings indicate there is variation is the extent to which doctors both engage in and document evidence of reflection. Further research is needed to explore factors that enable or inhibit the use of the e-portfolio for reflection and whether recorded reflection is a true picture of the cognitive process involved.
在默西塞德教务长的专业培训岗位上的医生预计将反思他们的临床实践,并在电子档案中记录他们的学习经验。本研究的目的是专门探讨他们如何参与实践反思以及他们如何利用学习档案来记录这方面的证据。使用改良 Delphi 技术来开发一个分级系统,以确定参与者在电子档案中记录的反思水平。然后使用定性方法分析反思性叙述的记录,该方法涉及对数据进行编码和分类。这项研究表明,反思的数量和质量都存在很大差异。在定性数据分析中特别值得注意的是与临床知识和技能、实践中的学习、沟通、感觉、反思的学习经验类型以及更广泛的医疗实践方面相关的主题。研究结果表明,医生在参与和记录反思证据的程度上存在差异。需要进一步研究,以探讨促进或抑制使用电子档案进行反思的因素,以及记录的反思是否真实反映了所涉及的认知过程。