• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

档案袋作为评估医学生创伤学临床能力的工具。

Portfolio as a tool to evaluate clinical competences of traumatology in medical students.

作者信息

Santonja-Medina Fernando, García-Sanz M Paz, Martínez-Martínez Francisco, Bó David, García-Estañ Joaquín

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Traumatology, University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain; Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Education, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain.

出版信息

Adv Med Educ Pract. 2016 Feb 11;7:57-61. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S91401. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S91401
PMID:26929675
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4758781/
Abstract

This article investigates whether a reflexive portfolio is instrumental in determining the level of acquisition of clinical competences in traumatology, a subject in the 5th year of the degree of medicine. A total of 131 students used the portfolio during their clinical rotation of traumatology. The students' portfolios were blind evaluated by four professors who annotated the existence (yes/no) of 23 learning outcomes. The reliability of the portfolio was moderate, according to the kappa index (0.48), but the evaluation scores between evaluators were very similar. Considering the mean percentage, 59.8% of the students obtained all the competences established and only 13 of the 23 learning outcomes (56.5%) were fulfilled by >50% of the students. Our study suggests that the portfolio may be an important tool to quantitatively analyze the acquisition of traumatology competences of medical students, thus allowing the implementation of methods to improve its teaching.

摘要

本文探讨了反思性档案袋对于确定医学专业五年级创伤学临床能力的掌握水平是否具有帮助。共有131名学生在创伤学临床轮转期间使用了该档案袋。学生的档案袋由四位教授进行盲评,他们标注了23项学习成果的达成情况(是/否)。根据kappa指数(0.48),档案袋的可靠性为中等,但评估者之间的评分非常相似。考虑平均百分比,59.8%的学生获得了所有既定能力,并且23项学习成果中只有13项(56.5%)被超过50%的学生达成。我们的研究表明,档案袋可能是定量分析医学生创伤学能力掌握情况的重要工具,从而有助于实施改进教学的方法。

相似文献

1
Portfolio as a tool to evaluate clinical competences of traumatology in medical students.档案袋作为评估医学生创伤学临床能力的工具。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2016 Feb 11;7:57-61. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S91401. eCollection 2016.
2
Exploring students' perceptions on the use of significant event analysis, as part of a portfolio assessment process in general practice, as a tool for learning how to use reflection in learning.探索学生对将重大事件分析作为全科医疗档案袋评估过程的一部分,作为学习如何在学习中运用反思的一种工具的看法。
BMC Med Educ. 2007 Mar 30;7:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-7-5.
3
Mismatch between student and tutor evaluation of training needs: a study of traumatology rotations.学生与导师对培训需求评估的差异:创伤学轮转研究
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Nov 21;11(1):826. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3925-1.
4
Making portfolios work in practice.让投资组合在实际中发挥作用。
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Jun;46(6):595-603. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03050.x.
5
Undergraduate medical students' views about a reflective portfolio assessment of their communication skills learning.本科医学生对其沟通技能学习的反思性档案评估的看法。
Med Educ. 2004 Feb;38(2):125-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2004.01750.x.
6
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
7
The influence of reflection on portfolio learning in undergraduate dental education.反思对本科牙医学教育中组合学习的影响。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2013 Feb;17(1):e93-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2012.00766.x. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
8
A Web-based geriatrics portfolio to document medical students' learning outcomes.一个用于记录医学生学习成果的基于网络的老年医学档案袋。
Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):937-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00043.
9
Students' perceptions on the use of portfolios in pre-registration nursing education: a questionnaire survey.学生对注册前护理教育中使用档案袋的看法:一项问卷调查
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Mar;43(3):333-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.05.005. Epub 2005 Jul 21.
10
Evaluation of a portfolio-based course on self-development for pre-medical students in Korea.对韩国医学预科学生基于项目组合的自我发展课程的评估。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;16:38. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.38. Epub 2019 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Medical Student Portfolios: A Systematic Scoping Review.医学生档案袋:一项系统性综述
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2022 Mar 3;9:23821205221076022. doi: 10.1177/23821205221076022. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
2
A KSA system for competency-based assessment of clinicians' professional development in China and quality gap analysis.基于能力的中国临床医生专业发展的 KSA 系统评估和质量差距分析。
Med Educ Online. 2022 Dec;27(1):2037401. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2037401.
3
Mismatch between student and tutor evaluation of training needs: a study of traumatology rotations.学生与导师对培训需求评估的差异:创伤学轮转研究
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Nov 21;11(1):826. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3925-1.

本文引用的文献

1
A Student Portfolio: The Golden Key to Reflective, Experiential, and Evidence-based Learning.学生作品集:反思性、体验式和循证学习的金钥匙。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2010 Jun;41(2):72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2010.03.001. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
2
"Portfolios" as a method of assessment in medical education.“档案袋”作为医学教育中的一种评估方法。
Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2014 Spring;7(2):89-93.
3
Reflections: an inquiry into medical students' professional identity formation.反思:对医学生专业身份形成的探究。
Med Educ. 2014 May;48(5):489-501. doi: 10.1111/medu.12382.
4
A successful faculty development program for implementing a sociocultural ePortfolio assessment tool.成功实施社会文化电子档案评估工具的教师发展计划。
Acad Med. 2014 Feb;89(2):257-62. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000120.
5
Programmatic assessment of competency-based workplace learning: when theory meets practice.基于能力的工作场所学习的计划性评估:理论与实践的结合。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Sep 11;13:123. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-123.
6
Competence-based curriculum development for general practice in Germany: a stepwise peer-based approach instead of reinventing the wheel.德国全科医学基于能力的课程开发:一种逐步的基于同行的方法,而非从头开始。
BMC Res Notes. 2013 Aug 9;6:314. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-314.
7
An electronic portfolio for quantitative assessment of surgical skills in undergraduate medical education.电子档案袋用于评估本科医学教育中外科技能的量化评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 May 6;13:65. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-65.
8
Supporting students in self-regulation: use of formative feedback and portfolios in a problem-based learning setting.支持学生自我调节:在基于问题的学习环境中使用形成性反馈和档案袋。
Med Teach. 2013 Aug;35(8):655-60. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.785630. Epub 2013 May 3.
9
Beyond assessment of learning toward assessment for learning: educating tomorrow's physicians.从学习评估走向学习促进评估:培养明日医生。
Med Teach. 2013 Jul;35(7):560-3. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.787141. Epub 2013 May 3.
10
Composite reliability of a workplace-based assessment toolbox for postgraduate medical education.基于工作场所的研究生医学教育评估工具包的综合可靠性。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2013 Dec;18(5):1087-102. doi: 10.1007/s10459-013-9450-z. Epub 2013 Mar 15.