• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用有限元胸部模型评估胸部偏移作为侧面碰撞损伤标准的情况。

Evaluation of thoracic deflection as an injury criterion for side impact using a finite elements thorax model.

作者信息

Song Eric, Trosseille Xavier, Baudrit Pascal

机构信息

LAB Peugeot-Citroën Renault, 132 Rue des Suisses, 92000 Nanterre, France.

出版信息

Stapp Car Crash J. 2009 Nov;53:155-91. doi: 10.4271/2009-22-0006.

DOI:10.4271/2009-22-0006
PMID:20058554
Abstract

This study aims to investigate the relationship between the number of rib fractures and the thoracic deflection in side impact, and in particular its variability with respect to various loading configurations. The relevance of thoracic deflection as an injury criterion depends on the existence or not of this variability. Few studies were dedicated to this issue in the literature. First, a validation database was established, which covers different impact directions (frontal, lateral and oblique), different loading types (impactor, belt and airbag), and different injury levels (from the absence of, to presence of numerous ribs fractured). The HUMOS human body model was then modified and validated versus the database. Besides the typical validation in terms of global response, particular attention was paid to validate the model with respect to the ribcage strain profile, the occurrence of rib fractures and their locations. Some key features relative to the thorax modeling (such as the connection between the ribcage and the surrounding tissues) were also investigated. Using this model, the relationship between the rib fracture and thoracic deflection was studied versus loading type. It was demonstrated that this relationship does not change significantly from one loading type to another, supporting the thoracic deflection as a relevant indicator of ribcage injury level. In addition, the relationship between the thoracic response and the test severity (such as impact velocity or distance between airbag and subject), was also established for each kind of loading. These relationships, obtained over a unique subject, are free of uncertainty relative to cadaver scattering, measurement and autopsy. They provide a consistent characterization of thoracic injuries under various test conditions and therefore, can be used to guide cadaver test protocol development and result analysis.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨侧面碰撞中肋骨骨折数量与胸廓变形之间的关系,特别是其在各种加载配置下的变异性。胸廓变形作为损伤标准的相关性取决于这种变异性的存在与否。文献中很少有研究致力于这个问题。首先,建立了一个验证数据库,该数据库涵盖不同的碰撞方向(正面、侧面和斜向)、不同的加载类型(撞击器、安全带和安全气囊)以及不同的损伤程度(从无肋骨骨折到多根肋骨骨折)。然后对HUMOS人体模型进行修改并与该数据库进行验证。除了在整体响应方面的典型验证外,还特别关注在胸廓应变分布、肋骨骨折的发生及其位置方面对模型进行验证。还研究了一些与胸廓建模相关的关键特征(如胸廓与周围组织之间的连接)。使用该模型,研究了肋骨骨折与胸廓变形之间相对于加载类型的关系。结果表明,这种关系在不同加载类型之间没有显著变化,支持胸廓变形作为胸廓损伤程度的相关指标。此外,还针对每种加载建立了胸廓响应与试验严重程度(如撞击速度或安全气囊与受试者之间的距离)之间的关系。这些在单个受试者上获得的关系不存在与尸体散射、测量和尸检相关的不确定性。它们提供了各种试验条件下胸廓损伤的一致特征,因此可用于指导尸体试验方案的制定和结果分析。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of thoracic deflection as an injury criterion for side impact using a finite elements thorax model.使用有限元胸部模型评估胸部偏移作为侧面碰撞损伤标准的情况。
Stapp Car Crash J. 2009 Nov;53:155-91. doi: 10.4271/2009-22-0006.
2
Sensitivity of the WorldSID 50th and ES-2re Thoraces to Loading Configuration.WorldSID 50th和ES-2re胸部模型对加载配置的敏感性。
Stapp Car Crash J. 2010 Nov;54:259-87. doi: 10.4271/2010-22-0013.
3
Non-censored rib fracture data during frontal PMHS sled tests.正面人体尸体撞击滑车试验期间的非删失肋骨骨折数据。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2016 Sep;17 Suppl 1:131-40. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1203069.
4
Injuries in Full-Scale Vehicle Side Impact Moving Deformable Barrier and Pole Tests Using Postmortem Human Subjects.使用尸体进行的全尺寸车辆侧面碰撞移动变形壁障和柱碰撞试验中的损伤情况。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S224-30. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1062887.
5
Investigation of chest injury mechanism caused by different seatbelt loads in frontal impact.不同安全带负荷在正面碰撞中引起胸部损伤机制的研究。
Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2017;19(3):53-62.
6
Evaluation of near-side oblique frontal impacts using THOR with SD3 shoulder.使用配备SD3肩部的THOR对近侧斜前方碰撞进行评估。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15 Suppl 1:S96-102. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.934367.
7
The influence of pre-existing rib fractures on Global Human Body Models Consortium thorax response in frontal and oblique impact.既往肋骨骨折对全球人体模型联盟胸部在正面和斜向撞击中响应的影响。
J Biomech. 2018 Mar 1;69:54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Jan 13.
8
Age- and sex-specific thorax finite element model development and simulation.特定年龄和性别的胸部有限元模型开发与模拟
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 1:S57-65. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1005208.
9
The influence of arm position on thoracic response in side impacts.手臂位置对侧面碰撞中胸部反应的影响。
Stapp Car Crash J. 2008 Nov;52:379-420. doi: 10.4271/2008-22-0016.
10
Comparison of the Thorax Dynamic Responses of Small Female and Midsize Male Post Mortem Human Subjects in Side and Forward Oblique Impact Tests.小型女性和中型男性尸体在侧面和前斜向撞击试验中胸部动态响应的比较。
Stapp Car Crash J. 2014 Nov;58:103-21. doi: 10.4271/2014-22-0004.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation and Validation of Thorax Model Responses: A Hierarchical Approach to Achieve High Biofidelity for Thoracic Musculoskeletal System.胸部模型响应的评估与验证:一种实现胸段肌肉骨骼系统高生物逼真度的分层方法。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Jul 16;9:712656. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.712656. eCollection 2021.
2
On the protective capacity of a safety vest for the thoracic injury caused by falling down.关于安全背心对跌倒引起的胸部损伤的保护能力。
Biomed Eng Online. 2019 Apr 2;18(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12938-019-0652-3.
3
Development and Validation of Dummies and Human Models Used in Crash Test.
碰撞测试中使用的假人和人体模型的开发与验证。
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2018 Nov 13;2018:3832850. doi: 10.1155/2018/3832850. eCollection 2018.
4
Quantitative Analysis of Tissue Damage Evolution in Porcine Liver With Interrupted Mechanical Testing Under Tension, Compression, and Shear.在拉伸、压缩和剪切力作用下进行间断力学测试时猪肝脏组织损伤演变的定量分析
J Biomech Eng. 2018 Jul 1;140(7):0710101-07101010. doi: 10.1115/1.4039825.