• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前上颌种植修复的美学指数。

Esthetic index for anterior maxillary implant-supported restorations.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kaunas University of Medicine, Kaunas, Lithuania.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 2010 Jan;81(1):34-42. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090385.

DOI:10.1902/jop.2009.090385
PMID:20059415
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to develop and validate a complex esthetic index (CEI) designed for rating the esthetics of anterior maxillary implant-supported restorations with respect to the surrounding soft and hard tissues.

METHODS

Fifty patients (31 males and 19 females; age: 18 to 50 years; mean age +/- SD: 32.4 +/- 9.1 years) previously treated with dental implants were evaluated regarding the esthetic results of their restorations using the proposed CEI. Two calibrated oral surgeons did the evaluation and recording. The evaluation was carried out twice by each of the examiners 2 weeks apart. The weighted Cohen's kappa was used to calculate the intra- and interobserver agreement.

RESULTS

An analysis of CEI for 50 anterior maxillary implant-supported restorations showed good intra- and interobserver agreement for the soft tissue index (S) and implant-supported restoration index (R). Only the interobserver agreement for the overall R was rated as moderate (0.54 and 0.52). The single-parameter analysis showed that the lowest (moderate) intra- and interobserver agreement was with the subjective parameters of S (soft tissue color and texture variations) and R (crown surface roughness and ridges and color and translucency). An adequate CEI of S100, P100, and R100 was scored by both examiners in 10% and 12% of cases for evaluations I and II, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents evidence that this newly developed CEI, which incorporates the implant restoration and adjacent soft and hard tissue parameters, is a reproducible tool for scoring anterior implant esthetic predictably. However, prospective clinical trials involving examiners with different training backgrounds are needed to further validate the long-term stability of this index.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在开发和验证一种复杂的美学指数(CEI),用于评估前上颌种植体支持修复体的美学效果,涉及周围软硬组织。

方法

对 50 名患者(31 名男性和 19 名女性;年龄:18 至 50 岁;平均年龄 +/- SD:32.4 +/- 9.1 岁)进行评估,使用提出的 CEI 评估其修复体的美学效果。两名经过校准的口腔外科医生进行评估和记录。评估由每位检查者在 2 周内进行两次。使用加权 Cohen's kappa 计算观察者内和观察者间的一致性。

结果

对 50 例前上颌种植体支持修复体的 CEI 分析显示,软组织指数(S)和种植体支持修复指数(R)的观察者内和观察者间一致性良好。只有整体 R 的观察者间一致性被评为中度(0.54 和 0.52)。单参数分析显示,S(软组织颜色和质地变化)和 R(牙冠表面粗糙度和嵴以及颜色和半透明度)的主观参数的观察者内和观察者间一致性最低(中度)。两位检查者在评估 I 和 II 时,分别有 10%和 12%的病例对 S100、P100 和 R100 进行了足够的 CEI 评分。

结论

本研究表明,这种新开发的 CEI 结合了种植体修复体和相邻软硬组织参数,是一种可重复使用的工具,可预测性地评估前牙种植体的美学效果。然而,需要涉及不同培训背景的检查者的前瞻性临床试验来进一步验证该指数的长期稳定性。

相似文献

1
Esthetic index for anterior maxillary implant-supported restorations.前上颌种植修复的美学指数。
J Periodontol. 2010 Jan;81(1):34-42. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090385.
2
A new index for rating aesthetics of implant-supported single crowns and adjacent soft tissues--the Implant Crown Aesthetic Index.一种用于评估种植体支持的单冠及相邻软组织美学效果的新指标——种植冠美学指数。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):645-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01128.x.
3
Reproducibility of the pink esthetic score--rating soft tissue esthetics around single-implant restorations with regard to dental observer specialization.粉色美学评分的可重复性——关于牙科观察者专业背景对单颗种植体修复周围软组织美学的评分
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2008;20(6):375-84; discussion 385. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00212.x.
4
Evaluation of soft-tissue alteration around implant-supported single-tooth restoration in the anterior maxilla: the pink esthetic score.上颌前部种植体支持单颗牙修复周围软组织改变的评估:粉色美学评分
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Jun;19(6):560-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01522.x.
5
Reproducibility of the implant crown aesthetic index--rating aesthetics of single-implant crowns and adjacent soft tissues with regard to observer dental specialization.种植体冠美学指数的可重复性——关于观察者牙科专业对单颗种植体冠及相邻软组织美学的评级
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Sep;11(3):201-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00107.x. Epub 2008 Jul 23.
6
Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score.单颗牙种植冠周围软组织评估:粉色美学评分
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):639-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x.
7
Single implants in the esthetic zone: analysis of recent peri-implant soft tissue alterations and patient satisfaction. A photographic study.美学区单颗种植体:种植体周围软组织近期变化及患者满意度的分析。一项摄影研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):578-86.
8
Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores.使用客观美学标准对早期植入的上颌前牙单颗种植体进行疗效评估:一项横断面回顾性研究,对45例患者进行了2至4年的随访,并采用了粉红美学评分和白色美学评分。
J Periodontol. 2009 Jan;80(1):140-51. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080435.
9
Evaluation of the influence exerted by different dental specialty backgrounds and measuring instrument reproducibility on esthetic aspects of maxillary implant-supported single crown.评估不同牙科专业背景和测量仪器重复性对上颌种植单冠美学方面的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Mar;26(3):250-6. doi: 10.1111/clr.12532. Epub 2014 Dec 14.
10
Aesthetic outcome of single-tooth implant restorations following early implant placement and guided bone regeneration: crown and soft tissue dimensions compared with contralateral teeth.早期种植体植入和引导骨再生后单颗牙种植修复的美学效果:与对侧牙相比的牙冠和软组织尺寸
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Oct;20(10):1063-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01746.x. Epub 2009 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-Dimensional Peri-Implant Tissue Changes in Immediately vs. Early Placed Tapered Implants Restored with Two Different Ceramic Materials-1 Year Results.两种不同陶瓷材料修复的即刻种植与早期种植锥形种植体周围三维组织变化——1年结果
Materials (Basel). 2023 Aug 15;16(16):5636. doi: 10.3390/ma16165636.
2
Comparison of Classifications and Indexes for Extraction Socket and Implant Supported Restoration in the Aesthetic Zone: a Systematic Review.美学区拔牙窝和种植体支持修复的分类与指标比较:一项系统评价
J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2022 Jun 30;13(2):e1. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2022.13201. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
3
Reproducibility and validity of anterior implant esthetic indices: A review.
前牙种植美学指数的可重复性和有效性:综述
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2020 Jul-Aug;24(4):301-308. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_528_19. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
4
The Functional Implant Prosthodontic Score (FIPS): assessment of reproducibility and observer variability.功能性植入义齿修复评分(FIPS):评估可重复性和观察者变异性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jul;22(6):2319-2324. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2332-7. Epub 2018 Jan 3.