Meijer Henny J A, Stellingsma Kees, Meijndert Leo, Raghoebar Gerry M
Department of Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):645-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01128.x.
The important item of aesthetics is rarely included in evaluation studies. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an index for rating aesthetics of implant-supported single crowns and adjacent soft tissues.
Nine items were selected, which have an influence on the aesthetic result. The items are based on the anatomic form, colour and surface characteristics of the crown and on the anatomic form, colour and surface characteristics of the peri-implant soft tissues. Two oral-maxillofacial surgeons and two prosthodontists rated 24 implant-supported single-tooth restorations and adjacent soft tissues on a form with the nine items of the rating index. The rating was carried out twice by each of the examiners. Weighted Cohen's kappa was calculated to express the intra- and interobserver agreement.
Intraobserver results indicated that the agreement between the first and second rating of both the prosthodontists was good (both 0.7) and that the agreement of the oral-maxillofacial surgeons was moderate (0.49 and 0.56). The best interobserver agreement was found between the two prosthodontists (0.61, good agreement).
The Implant Crown Aesthetic Index is an objective tool in rating aesthetics of implant-supported single crowns and adjacent soft tissues. The rating is best be carried out by one prosthodontist to have the highest reliability.
美学的重要项目很少被纳入评估研究。本研究的目的是开发并验证一种用于评估种植体支持的单冠及相邻软组织美学效果的指数。
选取了九个对美学效果有影响的项目。这些项目基于牙冠的解剖形态、颜色和表面特征以及种植体周围软组织的解剖形态、颜色和表面特征。两名口腔颌面外科医生和两名口腔修复医生根据该评估指数的九个项目,在一份表格上对24个种植体支持的单牙修复体及相邻软组织进行评分。每位检查者都进行了两次评分。计算加权科恩kappa系数以表示观察者内和观察者间的一致性。
观察者内结果表明,两名口腔修复医生第一次和第二次评分之间的一致性良好(均为0.7),而口腔颌面外科医生的一致性为中等(分别为0.49和0.56)。两名口腔修复医生之间的观察者间一致性最佳(0.61,一致性良好)。
种植体冠美学指数是评估种植体支持的单冠及相邻软组织美学效果的一种客观工具。最好由一名口腔修复医生进行评分以获得最高的可靠性。