Faculty of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Int J Infect Dis. 2010 Jul;14(7):e567-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2009.09.003. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
Since hepatitis A virus (HAV) is acquired primarily through the fecal-oral pathway, several investigators have used HAV seropositivity as a proxy for exposure to this pathway. This paper is a critical review of the evidence relevant to the association between seropositivity to HAV and Helicobacter pylori, and considers the validity of comparisons for testing the hypothesis that H. pylori spreads by the fecal-oral route.
A Medline search identified reports of all types published in the English language literature that were linked to the keywords 'Campylobacter pylori', 'hepatitis A', or 'Helicobacter pylori', cross-referenced with 'seroepidemiology', 'seroprevalence', or 'seropositivity'. Studies identified by the search were included in the review if they used specific IgG antibodies to classify the serostatus of subjects for both HAV and H. pylori infection and provided an estimate of the magnitude of the association between HAV and H. pylori or information that permitted calculation of an odds ratio (OR).
Out of the 21 studies identified, 15 met the inclusion criteria. The studies showed ORs for an association of HAV and H. pylori that ranged from 0.81 to 8.4. After adjustment for potential confounders, ORs shifted toward the null. They also showed that HAV seroprevalence is lower than H. pylori seroprevalence in early life and then becomes higher in later life. Thus in most populations, the trends cross over at some point.
The observed associations between the two infections are generally overestimated by the confounding effects of age and socio-economic status-related factors, and when these factors are controlled, the association becomes weak. Moreover, HAV infection elicits a long-term antibody response, while H. pylori infection does not. Consequently, serostatus comparison does not constitute a convincing test of the fecal-oral transmission hypothesis for H. pylori.
由于甲型肝炎病毒(HAV)主要通过粪-口途径传播,因此一些研究人员使用 HAV 血清阳性作为接触该途径的替代指标。本文批判性地回顾了 HAV 血清阳性与幽门螺杆菌之间关联的证据,并考虑了用于检验幽门螺杆菌通过粪-口途径传播这一假说的检测结果的有效性。
通过 Medline 搜索,识别出与关键词“空肠弯曲菌”、“甲型肝炎”或“幽门螺杆菌”相关的所有类型的报告,并用“血清流行病学”、“血清流行率”或“血清阳性率”进行交叉参考。搜索确定的研究如果使用特定的 IgG 抗体对 HAV 和 H. pylori 感染的血清状态进行分类,并提供 HAV 和 H. pylori 之间关联程度的估计值或允许计算比值比(OR)的信息,则纳入综述。
在确定的 21 项研究中,有 15 项符合纳入标准。这些研究显示 HAV 和 H. pylori 之间存在关联的 OR 值范围为 0.81 至 8.4。在调整了潜在混杂因素后,OR 值向零值偏移。它们还表明,HAV 血清流行率在生命早期低于 H. pylori 血清流行率,然后在生命后期升高。因此,在大多数人群中,这两种趋势在某个时候会交叉。
两种感染之间的观察到的关联通常被年龄和与社会经济地位相关的因素的混杂效应所高估,当控制这些因素时,关联变得很弱。此外,HAV 感染会引起长期的抗体反应,而 H. pylori 感染则不会。因此,血清状态比较不能构成对 H. pylori 粪-口传播假说的令人信服的检验。