Neuropsychology Unit, Department of Cognitive Science, University of Liège, Belgium.
Cortex. 2011 Feb;47(2):157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.11.006. Epub 2009 Dec 22.
Several studies using the mirror-reading paradigm have shown that procedural learning and repetition priming may be preserved in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) (e.g., Deweer et al., 1994). According to the classical interpretation, improved reading time for repeated words is sustained by a repetition priming effect, while procedural learning is demonstrated when this improvement is also observed for new words. Following Masson (1986), the hypothesis tested in the present study was that improved reading of new words could also be due to a repetition priming effect rather than to the acquisition of a mirror-reading skill. Indeed, because the same letters are presented throughout the task, a repetition priming effect for the letters could suffice to explain the improvement in performance. To test this hypothesis, we administered to 30 healthy young and elderly subjects and to 30 AD patients a new mirror-reading task in two phases: an acquisition phase comprising pseudo-words constructed with one part of the alphabet, and a test phase in which both pseudo-words constructed with the same part of the alphabet and pseudo-words constructed with another part of the alphabet were presented. If the new pseudo-words composed with repeated letters were read faster, it would reflect a repetition priming effect; if pseudo-words composed of 'new' letters were read faster, it would reflect a procedural learning effect. The results show comparable repetition priming effects in AD patients and in healthy elderly subjects, whereas only healthy subjects showed a procedural learning effect. These results suggest, contrary to previous studies, that the learning of a new perceptual skill may not always be preserved in AD.
几项使用镜像阅读范式的研究表明,程序性学习和重复启动在阿尔茨海默病(AD)的早期阶段可能得到保留(例如,Deweer 等人,1994)。根据经典解释,重复单词的阅读时间的改善是由重复启动效应维持的,而当这种改善也观察到新单词时,则表现出程序性学习。遵循 Masson(1986)的假设,本研究检验的假设是,新单词的阅读改善也可能归因于重复启动效应,而不是获得镜像阅读技能。事实上,由于在整个任务中呈现相同的字母,字母的重复启动效应足以解释表现的提高。为了检验这一假设,我们对 30 名健康的年轻和老年受试者以及 30 名 AD 患者进行了一项新的镜像阅读任务,该任务分为两个阶段:一个是由字母的一部分构成的伪词的获取阶段,另一个是测试阶段,在该阶段中,同时呈现由同一部分字母构成的伪词和由另一部分字母构成的伪词。如果由重复字母组成的新伪词阅读速度更快,这将反映出重复启动效应;如果由“新”字母组成的伪词阅读速度更快,则反映出程序性学习效应。结果表明,AD 患者和健康老年受试者的重复启动效应相当,而只有健康受试者表现出程序性学习效应。这些结果表明,与之前的研究相反,新感知技能的学习在 AD 中可能并不总是保留。