社区对环境噪声的反应与心血管风险评分的影响。

Community response to environmental noise and the impact on cardiovascular risk score.

机构信息

Institute of Hygiene, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2010 Feb 15;408(6):1264-70. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.12.033. Epub 2010 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.12.033

PMID:20060571

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to investigate and evaluate the relationship between road traffic noise and cardiovascular risk.

METHODS

The study sample (n=659; 36.9% male, 63.1% female university students, mean age 22.83+/-1.58 years) included a group exposed to road traffic noise (n=280, L(eq,24h)=67+/-2dB(A)) and a control group (n=379, L(eq,24h)=58.7+/-6dB(A)). Subjective response was determined by a validated noise annoyance questionnaire. The ten year risk of developing a coronary heart disease event was quantified as an evaluation of cardiovascular risk (SCORE60, Framingham 10-year risk estimation and projection to the age of 60, relative risk SCORE chart).

RESULTS

Cardiovascular risk scores were significantly higher in the exposed group based on the Framingham scores projected to the age of 60, SCORE60 (AOR=2.72 (95% CI=1.21-6.15)) and the relative risk SCORE chart (AOR=2.81 (1.46-5.41)).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the association between road traffic noise and cardiovascular risk.

摘要

目的

我们的研究目的是调查和评估道路交通噪声与心血管风险之间的关系。

方法

研究样本（n=659；36.9%男性，63.1%女性大学生，平均年龄 22.83+/-1.58 岁）包括一组暴露于道路交通噪声的人群（n=280，L(eq,24h)=67+/-2dB(A))和对照组（n=379，L(eq,24h)=58.7+/-6dB(A))。主观反应通过经过验证的噪声烦恼问卷来确定。心血管风险的十年发病风险量化为心血管风险评估（SCORE60、Framingham 10 年风险评估和Projection 至 60 岁年龄、相对风险 SCORE 图表）。