Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON; Evidence Foundation, Cleveland Heights, OH, USA, Canada.
Université de Montréal Hospital Research Centre (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC; Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Noise Health. 2022 Jul-Sep;24(114):107-129. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_83_21.
: Exposure to acute noise can cause an increase in biological stress reactions, which provides biological plausibility for a potential association between sustained noise exposure and stress-related health effects. However, the certainty in the evidence for an association between exposures to noise on short- and long-term biomarkers of stress has not been widely explored. The objective of this review was to evaluate the strength of evidence between noise exposure and changes in the biological parameters known to contribute to the development of stress-related adverse cardiovascular responses.
This systematic review comprises English language comparative studies available in PubMed, Cochrane Central, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases from January 1, 1980 to December 29, 2021. Where possible, random-effects meta-analyses were used to examine the effect of noise exposure from various sources on stress-related cardiovascular biomarkers. The risk of bias of individual studies was assessed using the risk of bias of nonrandomized studies of exposures instrument. The certainty of the body of evidence for each outcome was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.
: The search identified 133 primary studies reporting on blood pressure, hypertension, heart rate, cardiac arrhythmia, vascular resistance, and cardiac output. Meta-analyses of blood pressure, hypertension, and heart rate suggested there may be signals of increased risk in response to a higher noise threshold or incrementally higher levels of noise. Across all outcomes, the certainty of the evidence was very low due to concerns with the risk of bias, inconsistency across exposure sources, populations, and studies and imprecision in the estimates of effects.
: This review identifies that exposure to higher levels of noise may increase the risk of some short- and long-term cardiovascular events; however, the certainty of the evidence was very low. This likely represents the inability to compare across the totality of the evidence for each outcome, underscoring the value of continued research in this area. Findings from this review may be used to inform policies of noise reduction or mitigation interventions.
急性噪声暴露会引起生物应激反应增加,这为持续噪声暴露与应激相关健康影响之间的潜在关联提供了生物学上的合理性。然而,关于短期和长期应激生物标志物暴露与噪声之间关联的证据确定性尚未得到广泛探讨。本综述的目的是评估噪声暴露与已知导致应激相关不良心血管反应发展的生物参数变化之间关联的证据强度。
本系统综述包括 1980 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 29 日期间在 PubMed、Cochrane 中心、EMBASE 和 CINAHL 数据库中可获得的英语比较研究。在可能的情况下,使用随机效应荟萃分析来检查来自各种噪声源的噪声暴露对与应激相关的心血管生物标志物的影响。使用非随机暴露研究工具评估个体研究的偏倚风险。使用推荐评估、制定和评估方法评估每个结局的证据体确定性。
搜索确定了 133 项报告血压、高血压、心率、心律失常、血管阻力和心输出量的原发性研究。血压、高血压和心率的荟萃分析表明,在更高的噪声阈值或更高水平的噪声下,风险可能会增加。由于对偏倚风险、暴露源、人群和研究之间的一致性以及效应估计的不准确性的担忧,所有结局的证据确定性都非常低。
本综述表明,暴露于更高水平的噪声可能会增加某些短期和长期心血管事件的风险;然而,证据的确定性非常低。这可能代表无法比较每个结局的全部证据,突出了该领域持续研究的价值。本综述的结果可用于为噪声降低或缓解干预措施的政策提供信息。