Dipartimento di Biologia Evoluzionistica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2009;45(4):432-8. doi: 10.1590/s0021-25712009000400013.
Whether invertebrates are able or not to experience pain is a highly controversial issue. An operative way to solve such a controversy might be to investigate their responses to potentially noxious stimuli and to collect evidence of their behavioural complexities as proxies of cognitive capacities. The principle of argument-by-analogy can be then applied to these data: the behaviour displayed by invertebrates is compared with that of "higher" animals, its similarity denoting the former's capacity to have analogous experiences. Here, the author discusses some examples, extracted from the literature on crustacean decapods, that pinpoint their nature of "sentient" animals. This review, however, also shows that research is still scanty in the field. The studies that examine the potential links between stress responses and pain experience are few, and the several papers that help elucidate cognitive abilities in decapods have been limited to a few taxa and are not specifically directed to the question of "sentience". On the contrary, also in the light of the expected revision of the current EU legislation in the matter, more scientific efforts should be expended on exploring the issue of pain experience in invertebrates.
无脊椎动物是否能够感受到疼痛是一个极具争议的问题。解决这一争议的一种可行方法可能是研究它们对潜在有害刺激的反应,并收集其行为复杂性的证据,以此作为认知能力的代表。然后可以将类比论证的原则应用于这些数据:将无脊椎动物的行为与“高等”动物的行为进行比较,其相似性表示前者具有类似的体验能力。在这里,作者从甲壳类十足目动物的文献中提取了一些例子,指出它们是有感知能力的动物。然而,这篇综述也表明,该领域的研究仍然匮乏。研究应激反应和疼痛体验之间潜在联系的研究很少,而有助于阐明十足目动物认知能力的几篇论文也仅限于少数几个分类群,并且没有专门针对“感知能力”这一问题。相反,鉴于目前欧盟在这方面立法的预期修订,应该投入更多的科学努力来探索无脊椎动物的疼痛体验问题。