Kurita Masakazu, Okazaki Mutsumi, Ozaki Mine, Tanaka Yukari, Tsuji Naoko, Takushima Akihiko, Harii Kiyonori
Department of Plastic Surgery, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Mitaka-shi, Tokyo, Japan.
J Craniofac Surg. 2010 Jan;21(1):45-9. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181c36304.
To optimize treatment of zygomatic bone fractures, patients' subjective evaluations of symptoms are necessary. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used for the quantitative assessment of subjective evaluation for symptoms and treatments in patients who underwent open reduction and rigid fixation. Degree of satisfaction and annoyances resulting from residual symptoms (deformity, pain, paresthesia, and trismus) and incisions used for exposure of the fracture site were investigated using an anonymous postal questionnaire. Forty-three patients provided responses. Total satisfaction was rated as 72.5% +/- 21.6%. Scores from the VAS for annoyance were significantly higher for paresthesia than for deformity, pain, or trismus. Residual deformity and pain significantly influenced total satisfaction. Upper vestibular, lower lid, and lateral brow incisions showed almost equivalent tendencies for annoyance. The VAS provided otherwise inaccessible information about patients' subjective evaluation. Treatment strategies should be optimized toward not only evaluation with objective measures but also patients' subjective evaluation.
为优化颧骨骨折的治疗,患者对症状的主观评估是必要的。视觉模拟量表(VAS)用于对接受切开复位和坚固内固定的患者的症状及治疗进行主观评估的定量分析。通过匿名邮寄问卷调查了残留症状(畸形、疼痛、感觉异常和牙关紧闭)及用于暴露骨折部位的切口所导致的满意度和烦恼程度。43例患者提供了回复。总体满意度为72.5%±21.6%。感觉异常的烦恼VAS评分显著高于畸形、疼痛或牙关紧闭。残留畸形和疼痛对总体满意度有显著影响。上前庭、下睑和眉外侧切口在烦恼程度方面显示出几乎相同的趋势。VAS提供了关于患者主观评估的其他难以获得的信息。治疗策略不仅应通过客观指标进行优化评估,还应考虑患者的主观评估。