Almogren Adel
Department of Immunology, College of Medicine and University Hospitals, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Med J. 2010 Jan;31(1):32-6.
Many laboratories do not test antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by indirect immune-fluorescence (IIF) in parallel with anti-double stranded (ds) DNA antibodies. This study attempts to investigate the legitimacy of such practice.
A retrospective laboratory data analysis of simultaneous assessment of ANA and anti-dsDNA antibody results of 106 patients with either diagnosed or suspected systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was performed at King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The ANA was detected by IIF on HEp2 cells and anti-dsDNA antibodies were assessed by specific ELISA test.
Among the patients, female preponderance (96.3%) was evident and a coarse speckled fluorescence pattern was commonly observed (60.4%). There was almost no detection of anti-dsDNA antibodies up to an ANA titer of 1:320. Anti-dsDNA antibodies were often detected at ANA titers of 1:640 and beyond. Other patterns of fluorescence observed at ANA titers as low as 1:40 and at higher dilutions were, fine speckled (14.15%), homogeneous (9.4%), anti-mitochondrial (7.5%), ribosomal (4.7%), and nucleolar (3.8%). Linear regression analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship (p=0.02) between ANA titers and anti-dsDNA antibodies only in the presence of a coarse speckled pattern.
The rare occurrence of anti-dsDNA antibodies at clinically significant ANA titers associated with the coarse speckled pattern may mask the diagnosis of SLE. Similarly, the diagnosis of SLE may be overlooked if anti-dsDNA antibodies are not checked in the presence of clinically insignificant ANA titers associated with other patterns of fluorescence.
许多实验室并不采用间接免疫荧光法(IIF)同时检测抗核抗体(ANA)和抗双链(ds)DNA抗体。本研究旨在调查这种做法的合理性。
在沙特阿拉伯利雅得的哈立德国王大学医院,对106例已确诊或疑似系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者的ANA和抗dsDNA抗体结果进行同步评估的实验室数据进行回顾性分析。ANA通过在HEp2细胞上的IIF检测,抗dsDNA抗体通过特异性ELISA试验评估。
患者中女性占优势(96.3%),常见粗颗粒荧光模式(60.4%)。ANA滴度达1:320时几乎未检测到抗dsDNA抗体。抗dsDNA抗体常在ANA滴度为1:640及以上时被检测到。在ANA滴度低至1:40及更高稀释度时观察到的其他荧光模式有细颗粒状(14.15%)、均质型(9.4%)、抗线粒体型(7.5%)、核糖体型(4.7%)和核仁型(3.8%)。线性回归分析显示,仅在存在粗颗粒模式时,ANA滴度与抗dsDNA抗体之间存在统计学显著关系(p = 0.02)。
与粗颗粒模式相关的具有临床意义的ANA滴度时抗dsDNA抗体罕见出现可能掩盖SLE的诊断。同样,如果在与其他荧光模式相关的无临床意义的ANA滴度存在时未检查抗dsDNA抗体,SLE的诊断可能被忽视。