• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对话为空气,空气为对话:在 COPD 实践中共同承担责任。

Dialogue for air, air for dialogue: towards shared responsibilities in COPD practice.

机构信息

VU University Medical Center, Department of Metamedica/Medical Humanities, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Care Anal. 2010 Dec;18(4):358-73. doi: 10.1007/s10728-009-0139-7.

DOI:10.1007/s10728-009-0139-7
PMID:20063199
Abstract

For the past several years patients have been expected to play a key role in their recovery. Self management and disease management have reached a hype status. Considering these recent trends what does this mean for the division of responsibilities between doctors and patients? What kind of role should healthcare providers play? With findings based on a qualitative research project of an innovative practice for people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) we reflect on these questions. In-depth interviews conducted with people with COPD, physiotherapists and a pulmonologist show that shifting responsibilities require a supportive attitude from healthcare providers and a dialogical communication between patients and professionals. Our findings show more is needed in order to motivate people with COPD to take responsibility and become co-owners in a process of recovery. The case example illustrates that people with COPD need support from fellow patients to learn to accept their disabilities. Awareness that COPD is more than just a lack of air, that mind and body interact, is a first step to investigate other potential problems and to enhance one's quality of life.

摘要

在过去的几年中,患者一直被期望在康复过程中发挥关键作用。自我管理和疾病管理已经达到了炒作的状态。考虑到这些最近的趋势,这对医生和患者之间的责任分工意味着什么?医疗保健提供者应该扮演什么样的角色?基于对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)创新实践的定性研究项目的结果,我们对这些问题进行了反思。对 COPD 患者、物理治疗师和肺病专家进行的深入访谈表明,责任转移需要医疗保健提供者持支持态度,以及患者和专业人员之间的对话式沟通。我们的研究结果表明,需要采取更多措施来激励 COPD 患者承担责任,并成为康复过程中的共同所有者。案例示例表明,COPD 患者需要从病友那里获得支持,以学会接受自己的残疾。认识到 COPD 不仅仅是缺乏空气,思想和身体相互作用,这是调查其他潜在问题和提高生活质量的第一步。

相似文献

1
Dialogue for air, air for dialogue: towards shared responsibilities in COPD practice.对话为空气,空气为对话:在 COPD 实践中共同承担责任。
Health Care Anal. 2010 Dec;18(4):358-73. doi: 10.1007/s10728-009-0139-7.
2
Exploring telemonitoring and self-management by patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative study embedded in a randomized controlled trial.探索慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的远程监测与自我管理:一项纳入随机对照试验的定性研究
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Dec;93(3):403-10. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 May 4.
3
Groping around in the dark for adequate COPD management: a qualitative study on experiences in long-term care.在黑暗中摸索以实现慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的充分管理:一项关于长期护理经验的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 10;20(1):1025. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05875-2.
4
Building COPD care on shaky ground: a mixed methods study from Swedish primary care professional perspective.在不稳定的基础上构建慢性阻塞性肺疾病护理:一项基于瑞典初级保健专业人员视角的混合方法研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 10;17(1):467. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2393-y.
5
A self-management approach using self-initiated action plans for symptoms with ongoing nurse support in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and comorbidities: the COPE-III study protocol.一种自我管理方法,在持续的护士支持下,让慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和合并症患者使用自我启动的行动计划来处理症状:COPE-III 研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Sep;36(1):81-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
6
Self-Care of People with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Meta-Synthesis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的自我护理:综合分析。
Patient. 2017 Aug;10(4):407-427. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0218-z.
7
Living With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: The Process of Self-Managing Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.与慢性阻塞性肺疾病共处:慢性阻塞性肺疾病的自我管理过程
J Nurs Res. 2016 Sep;24(3):262-71. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000152.
8
e-Vita: design of an innovative approach to COPD disease management in primary care through eHealth application.电子维塔:通过电子健康应用程序在初级保健中设计一种创新的慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理方法。
BMC Pulm Med. 2016 Aug 16;16(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12890-016-0282-5.
9
The preferences of people with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease for self-management support: A qualitative descriptive study.哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者对自我管理支持的偏好:一项定性描述性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Oct;30(19-20):2832-2841. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15790. Epub 2021 May 12.
10
Supported self-management for patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): an evidence synthesis and economic analysis.中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的支持性自我管理:证据综合与经济分析
Health Technol Assess. 2015 May;19(36):1-516. doi: 10.3310/hta19360.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of Patient-Provider Communication on Self-Management Among Patients With Chronic Illness: A Systematic Mixed Studies Review.医患沟通对慢性病患者自我管理的影响:一项系统的混合研究综述
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Apr;81(4):1678-1699. doi: 10.1111/jan.16492. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
2
Trapped in my lungs and fighting a losing battle. A phenomenological study of patients living with chronic obstructive and pulmonary disease.被困在我的肺部,进行着一场必输的战斗。一项关于慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的现象学研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2020 Mar;34(1):118-127. doi: 10.1111/scs.12713. Epub 2019 May 16.
3
Who is in control? Clinicians' view on their role in self-management approaches: a qualitative metasynthesis.

本文引用的文献

1
What is it to be a daughter? Identities under pressure in dementia care.身为女儿意味着什么?痴呆症护理压力下的身份认同。
Bioethics. 2007 Jan;21(1):1-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00518.x.
2
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for generalized anxiety disorder.基于正念的广泛性焦虑障碍认知疗法。
J Anxiety Disord. 2008 May;22(4):716-21. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.07.005. Epub 2007 Jul 22.
3
Care as a mutual endeavour: experiences of a multiple sclerosis patient and her healthcare professionals.作为共同努力的护理:一位多发性硬化症患者及其医护人员的经历
谁在掌控?临床医生对自身在自我管理方法中角色的看法:一项定性元综合研究
BMJ Open. 2015 May 5;5(5):e007413. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007413.
4
Self-management support from the perspective of patients with a chronic condition: a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.慢性病患者视角下的自我管理支持:定性研究的主题综合分析
Health Expect. 2016 Apr;19(2):194-208. doi: 10.1111/hex.12346. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
5
Moral learning in an integrated social and healthcare service network.在综合社会和医疗保健服务网络中进行道德学习。
Health Care Anal. 2012 Sep;20(3):281-96. doi: 10.1007/s10728-011-0187-7.
6
Patient issues in health research and quality of care: an inventory and data synthesis.患者在卫生研究和医疗质量中的问题:清单和数据综合。
Health Expect. 2013 Dec;16(4):308-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00718.x. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
Med Health Care Philos. 2006;9(3):349-57. doi: 10.1007/s11019-006-0003-6.
4
Somatization disorders in dermatology.皮肤病学中的躯体化障碍。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2006 Feb;18(1):41-7. doi: 10.1080/09540260500466832.
5
The expert patient: valid recognition or false hope?专家型患者:是有效认可还是虚假希望?
Med Health Care Philos. 2005;8(2):173-8. doi: 10.1007/s11019-005-2275-7.
6
An expert in what?: the need to clarify meaning and expectations in "The Expert Patient".在哪方面的专家?:澄清“专家型患者”中含义和期望的必要性。
Med Health Care Philos. 2005;8(2):153-7. doi: 10.1007/s11019-005-2279-3.
7
Two women with multiple sclerosis and their caregivers: conflicting normative expectations.两名患有多发性硬化症的女性及其照料者:相互冲突的规范期望。
Nurs Ethics. 2005 Sep;12(5):479-92. doi: 10.1191/0969733005ne816oa.
8
Sharing stories: narrative and dialogue in responsive nursing evaluation.分享故事:响应性护理评估中的叙事与对话
Eval Health Prof. 2005 Mar;28(1):90-109. doi: 10.1177/0163278704273080.
9
Framing the doctor-patient relationship in chronic illness: a comparative study of general practitioners' accounts.构建慢性病中的医患关系:全科医生叙述的比较研究
Sociol Health Illn. 2004 Mar;26(2):135-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2004.00384.x.
10
From compliance to concordance: barriers to accomplishing a re-framed model of health care interactions.从依从性到一致性:实现重新构建的医疗保健互动模式的障碍。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Feb;58(4):851-62. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00259-4.