Mudge Suzie, Kayes Nicola, McPherson Kathryn
Centre for Person Centred Research, Faculty of Health and Environmental Science, AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand.
Centre for Person Centred Research, Faculty of Health and Environmental Science, AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand Health Research Council of New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand.
BMJ Open. 2015 May 5;5(5):e007413. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007413.
To explore clinician perceptions of involvement in delivery of self-management approaches.
All healthcare settings.
EBSCO, Scopus and AMED databases were searched, in July 2013, for peer-reviewed studies in English reporting original qualitative data concerning perceptions of clinicians regarding their involvement in or integration of a self-management approach. Of 1930 studies identified, 1889 did not meet the inclusion criteria. Full text of 41 studies were reviewed by two independent reviewers; 14 papers were included for metasynthesis. Findings and discussion sections were imported into Nvivo-10 and coded line-by-line. Codes were organised into descriptive themes and cross-checked against original sources to check interpretation, and refined iteratively until findings represented an agreed understanding. Studies were appraised for quality.
Delivering self-management in practice appeared to be a complex process for many clinicians. The issue of 'control' arose in all studies, both in the qualitative data and authors' interpretations. The first theme: Who is in control?--represented ways clinicians talked of exercising control over patients and the control they expected patients to have over their condition. The second theme: Changing clinician views--reflected what appeared to be an essential transformation of practice experienced by some clinicians in the process of integrating self-management approaches into the practice. A range of challenges associated with shifting towards a self-management approach were reflected in the third theme, Overcoming challenges to change. Tensions appeared to exist around forming partnerships with patients. Strategies found helpful in the process of change included: dedicating time to practice reciprocity in communication style, peer support and self-reflection.
A consistent finding across studies is that 'control' is a key feature of how self-management is viewed by clinicians. They described challenges associated with the paradigm shift required to share or let go of control. Future research should identify whether strategies described by clinicians are key to successful self-management.
探讨临床医生对参与自我管理方法实施的看法。
所有医疗环境。
2013年7月,检索了EBSCO、Scopus和AMED数据库,以查找英文的同行评审研究,这些研究报告了有关临床医生对其参与或整合自我管理方法的看法的原始定性数据。在识别出的1930项研究中,1889项不符合纳入标准。两名独立评审员对41项研究的全文进行了审查;纳入14篇论文进行综合分析。将研究结果和讨论部分导入Nvivo-10并逐行编码。代码被组织成描述性主题,并与原始资料进行交叉核对以检查解释,并反复完善,直到研究结果代表了一致的理解。对研究进行质量评估。
对许多临床医生来说,在实践中实施自我管理似乎是一个复杂的过程。“控制权”问题在所有研究的定性数据和作者解释中都出现了。第一个主题:谁拥有控制权?——体现了临床医生谈论对患者行使控制权以及他们期望患者对自身病情拥有的控制权的方式。第二个主题:临床医生观念的转变——反映了一些临床医生在将自我管理方法整合到实践过程中所经历的实践的本质转变。第三个主题,克服变革挑战,反映了与转向自我管理方法相关的一系列挑战。在与患者建立伙伴关系方面似乎存在紧张关系。在变革过程中发现有帮助的策略包括:花时间在沟通方式上实行互惠、同伴支持和自我反思。
各研究的一个一致发现是,“控制权”是临床医生看待自我管理的一个关键特征。他们描述了与分享或放弃控制权所需的范式转变相关的挑战。未来的研究应确定临床医生描述的策略是否是成功进行自我管理的关键。