Department of Psychology, Drexel University, 245 N. 15th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA.
Int J Eat Disord. 2011 Jan;44(1):9-18. doi: 10.1002/eat.20782.
There is a growing consensus that there is a need to test the real-world effectiveness of eating disorder therapies that show promise in efficacy research. This article provides a narrative account of an NIMH-funded study that attempted to apply efficacy findings from CBT research to an Intensive Outpatient Program (IOP) at the largest community-based eating disorder program in the United States.
We describe the study as originally envisioned as well as the various challenges that the researchers and the IOP staff encountered in implementing this study.
The different training, assumptions, and "ways of knowing" of the research team and the treatment staff in regard to the nature of eating disorders and their treatment created multiple challenges for both groups during the study period. We describe valuable lessons learned about how to-and how not to-implement effectiveness designs in clinical settings that are relatively unfamiliar with empirically-based research findings.
It is hoped that our experience in attempting to apply efficacy-based research findings on eating disorders treatment in a community-based clinical setting will prove helpful to other researchers and service providers engaging in such translational research.
越来越多的人认为,有必要检验那些在疗效研究中显示出前景的饮食失调疗法在实际中的效果。本文叙述了一项由美国国立卫生研究院(NIMH)资助的研究,该研究试图将认知行为疗法(CBT)研究中的疗效发现应用于美国最大的社区为基础的饮食失调项目的强化门诊计划(IOP)。
我们描述了研究的最初设想,以及研究人员和 IOP 工作人员在实施这项研究时遇到的各种挑战。
研究团队和治疗人员在饮食失调及其治疗方面的不同培训、假设和“认知方式”,在研究期间给两组人员都带来了多重挑战。我们描述了一些宝贵的经验教训,了解如何以及如何不将有效的设计应用于相对不熟悉基于实证研究发现的临床环境中。
我们希望,我们在尝试将基于疗效的研究结果应用于社区临床环境中的饮食失调治疗方面的经验,将对从事这种转化研究的其他研究人员和服务提供者有所帮助。