Smrcka Václav
Charles University in Prague, First Faculty of Medicine, Institute for History of Medicine and Foreign Languages, Prague, Czech Republic.
Acta Univ Carol Med Monogr. 2009;156:27-56.
On the archaeological finds, written reports and in the composition of the bone tissue, we can suppose that social evolution in Hallstatt--La Tène period proceeded through the three following stages. In the Early Iron Age (Hallstatt period) with funerary furnishings of barrows, seldom, also, of burial grounds, we can distinguish only two groups: a ruler and his court with women and servants. Elements of nomadic and pastoral traditions can be distinguished in the ruling stratum. The second class of people living in bondage has agricultural features. At this first stage of social evolution (approximately between the 7th and the 5th centuries B.C.), in the period of princes, we can distinguish only two social groups--the king (prince) with his court on one side and peasants on the other side. This social stratification determines access to land and, at the same time, ownership of mobile wealth--cattle. The elite accumulates wealth coming also from other sources, for example, in an eponymic locality it mines salt and controls its distribution, other elites of the Hallstatt society control key points of trade, in the first place the trade in amber, being the trade proper provided by foreign merchants. In an archaeological context there appear the settlements of the elite of the refugium. The second social stage with military democracy (in the 4th and the 3rd centuries B.C.) is characterised by several factors: 1st Cheaper weapons, due to their manufacture using products with ensured sources of raw material, 2nd overproduction of foodstuffs, 3rd increase of population. Access to the sources has a larger spectrum, this is why the social stratification of the structured unevenness in this period is taking the form of a pyramid. This social pyramid is confirmed by written reports and also appears in the funerary furnishings. Not only are the ruler and his "court" put in the graves, but also all the members of the clan. We suppose that the new social group of priests, who gained a high social prestige both in wartime and in peacetime, took part in this change of mentality and opinions. Due to the rich admission of the dietary elements Sr and Zn, we suppose that it could be garniture 600 in the burial grounds that represents this group. From the result it can be deduced at 5% significance level (p = 0.0519) that also the relations between the garnitures within the social stratification differ consistently with the region. When strontium content in social groups was statistically tested regardless of the region, differences are found at the 5% level of significance (p = 0.0402) between the group II (males with weapons, females with anklets and with 2 bracelets, 54 skeletons with mean content of 198 microg Sr/g of bone) and group IV (males without funerary furniture, children and exceptions, 31 skeletons with mean content of 154.9 microg Sr/g of bone). Also at statistical testing of lead content, regardless of the region, there are differences at the 5% level of significance between group II (48 skeletons with mean content 1.5 microg Pb/g of bone) and group IV (27 skeletons with mean content 0.47 microg Pb/g of bone). Regardless of region there is an apparent difference in consumption of the vegetal component of diet (strontium) and social marker (lead) between the richest elite group II and group IV covering the persons living in bondage on the level of slaves. The third phase of social evolution of the urban type is characterised by the evolution of oppida. Production is fully concentrated here. An oppidum is a market place formed by agricultural villages. Due to the change of the funerary rite towards cremation and the absence of burial grounds, the social structure can only be judged in a mediated manner by means of written reports. A large number of smaller tribal "kingdoms" are concentrated into several larger ones, comprising even several tribes, such as, for example at the king of the Boeotians and of the Taurisks Kritasir in Pannonia and Norik [1]. In these three phases, social evolution lasted for 6 to 7 centuries and headed towards the state system. It was interrupted by the migrations of the Celts and by external pressure from the Romans and the Germans.
基于考古发现、书面报告以及骨骼组织的构成,我们可以推测,哈尔施塔特—拉坦诺时期的社会演变经历了以下三个阶段。在早期铁器时代(哈尔施塔特时期),墓葬中有陪葬品,墓地中也偶尔有陪葬品,我们只能区分出两个群体:统治者及其宫廷人员,包括女性和仆人。统治阶层具有游牧和畜牧传统的特征。第二类处于奴役状态的人具有农业特征。在社会演变的第一阶段(大约在公元前7世纪至5世纪),即王子时期,我们只能区分出两个社会群体——一方面是国王(王子)及其宫廷人员,另一方面是农民。这种社会分层决定了土地的获取,同时也决定了动产财富——牲畜的所有权。精英阶层积累的财富还来自其他来源,例如,在一个以其命名的地方开采盐并控制其分配,哈尔施塔特社会的其他精英控制着贸易的关键点,首先是琥珀贸易,这是由外国商人进行的真正贸易。在考古背景中出现了避难精英的定居点。第二个社会阶段是军事民主制(公元前4世纪和3世纪),其特点有几个:第一,由于使用有保证原材料来源的产品制造武器,武器价格降低;第二,食品过度生产;第三,人口增加。获取资源的范围更广,这就是为什么这个时期结构化不均衡的社会分层呈现出金字塔的形式。这种社会金字塔在书面报告中得到证实,也出现在陪葬品中。不仅统治者及其“宫廷人员”被葬入坟墓,氏族的所有成员也被葬入。我们推测,在战时和平时都获得了很高社会威望的新社会群体——牧师,参与了这种心态和观念的转变。由于墓葬中饮食元素锶和锌的丰富含量,我们推测墓地中的600号陪葬品可能代表了这个群体。从结果可以推断,在5%的显著性水平(p = 0.0519)下,社会分层中陪葬品之间的关系也因地区而存在一致差异。当不考虑地区对社会群体中的锶含量进行统计测试时,在5%的显著性水平(p = 0.0402)下发现第二组(携带武器的男性、戴脚镯和两只手镯的女性,54具骨骼,骨骼平均锶含量为198微克/克)和第四组(没有陪葬品的男性、儿童及其他特殊情况,共31具骨骼,骨骼平均锶含量为154.9微克/克)之间存在差异。在对铅含量进行统计测试时,同样不考虑地区,第二组(48具骨骼,骨骼平均铅含量为1.5微克/克)和第四组(27具骨骼,骨骼平均铅含量为0.47微克/克)之间在5%的显著性水平下也存在差异。不考虑地区,最富有的精英第二组和处于奴隶水平的受奴役的第四组在饮食的植物成分(锶)和社会标志物(铅)的消费上存在明显差异。社会演变的第三阶段是城市类型,其特点是奥皮达(设防城镇)的演变。生产完全集中在这里。奥皮达是由农业村庄形成的市场。由于丧葬仪式向火葬的转变以及墓地的缺失,只能通过书面报告以间接方式判断社会结构。大量较小的部落“王国”集中形成了几个较大的王国,甚至包括几个部落,例如在波奥提亚国王以及潘诺尼亚和诺里克的陶里斯克·克里塔西尔国王统治时期[1]。在这三个阶段中,社会演变持续了6到7个世纪,并朝着国家体系发展。它被凯尔特人的迁徙以及来自罗马人和日耳曼人的外部压力所打断。