Center for Anxiety and Related Disorders, Boston University, 648 Beacon Street, 6th Floor, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Am Psychol. 2010 Jan;65(1):13-20. doi: 10.1037/a0015643.
The author offers a 40-year perspective on the observation and study of negative effects from psychotherapy or psychological treatments. This perspective is placed in the context of the enormous progress in refining methodologies for psychotherapy research over that period of time, resulting in the clear demonstration of positive effects from psychological treatments for many disorders and problems. The study of negative effects--whether due to techniques, client variables, therapist variables, or some combination of these--has not been accorded the same degree of attention. Indeed, methodologies suitable for ascertaining positive effects often obscure negative effects in the absence of specific strategies for explicating these outcomes. Greater emphasis on more individual idiographic approaches to studying the effects of psychological interventions would seem necessary if psychologists are to avoid harming their patients and if they are to better understand the causes of negative or iatrogenic effects from their treatment efforts. This would be best carried out in the context of a strong collaboration among frontline clinicians and clinical scientists.
作者从观察和研究心理治疗或心理干预的负面效应的角度出发,提供了一个长达 40 年的视角。这一视角置于该时期内心理治疗研究方法不断完善的背景下,清楚地展示了心理治疗对许多障碍和问题的积极效果。对负面效应的研究——无论是由于技术、患者变量、治疗师变量还是这些因素的某种组合——并没有得到同样程度的关注。事实上,适合确定积极效果的方法往往会在缺乏具体策略来阐明这些结果的情况下掩盖负面效果。如果心理学家要避免伤害他们的患者,并且更好地了解他们治疗努力产生的负面或医源性影响的原因,那么似乎有必要更加重视对心理干预效果进行更个体化的研究。如果能够在一线临床医生和临床科学家之间建立强有力的合作关系,这将是最好的实施方式。