Suppr超能文献

临床学习组织文化量表(CLOCS)的编制与心理测量学测试。

Development and psychometric testing of the Clinical Learning Organisational Culture Survey (CLOCS).

机构信息

Nursing Practice Development Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2010 Oct;30(7):598-602. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.12.006. Epub 2010 Jan 12.

Abstract

AIM

This paper describes the development and psychometric testing of the Clinical Learning Organisational Culture Survey (CLOCS) that measures prevailing beliefs and assumptions important for learning to occur in the workplace.

METHOD

Items from a tool that measured motivation in workplace learning were adapted to the nursing practice context. The tool was tested in the clinical setting, and then further modified to enhance face and content validity.

PARTICIPANTS

Registered nurses (329) across three major Australian health facilities were surveyed between June 2007 and September 2007.

DATA ANALYSIS

An exploratory factor analysis identified five concepts--recognition, dissatisfaction, affiliation, accomplishment, and influence. VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY: Internal consistency measures of reliability revealed that four concepts had good internal consistency: recognition (alpha=.914), dissatisfaction (alpha=.771), affiliation (alpha=.801), accomplishment (alpha=.664), but less so for influence (alpha=.529).

RESULTS

This tool effectively measures recognition, affiliation and accomplishment--three concepts important for learning in practice situations, as well as dissatisfied staff across all these domains. Testing of additional influence items identify that this concept is difficult to delineate.

CONCLUSION

The CLOCS can effectively inform leaders about concepts inherent in the culture important for maximising learning by staff.

摘要

目的

本文介绍了临床学习组织文化量表(CLOCS)的开发和心理测量学测试,该量表用于衡量对工作场所发生学习至关重要的普遍信念和假设。

方法

从用于衡量工作场所学习动机的工具中改编了一些项目,以适应护理实践环境。该工具在临床环境中进行了测试,然后进一步修改以提高表面效度和内容效度。

参与者

2007 年 6 月至 9 月期间,在澳大利亚三个主要医疗机构中对注册护士(329 名)进行了调查。

数据分析

探索性因素分析确定了五个概念——认可、不满、隶属关系、成就和影响。

效度和信度

可靠性的内部一致性测量显示,四个概念具有良好的内部一致性:认可(alpha=.914)、不满(alpha=.771)、隶属关系(alpha=.801)、成就(alpha=.664),但影响(alpha=.529)的一致性稍差。

结果

该工具有效地衡量了实践情境中学习的三个重要概念,即认可、隶属关系和成就,以及所有这些领域中不满的员工。对额外影响项目的测试表明,这个概念很难界定。

结论

CLOCS 可以有效地为领导者提供有关文化中对员工学习最大化至关重要的概念的信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验