• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生对健康信息交换的态度:全州范围调查的结果。

Physician attitudes toward health information exchange: results of a statewide survey.

机构信息

Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02120, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):66-70. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3241.

DOI:10.1197/jamia.M3241
PMID:20064804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2995629/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess physicians' attitudes toward health information exchange (HIE) and physicians' willingness to pay to participate in HIE.

DESIGN

We conducted a cross-sectional mail survey of 1296 licensed physicians (77% response rate) in Massachusetts in 2007.

MEASUREMENTS

Perceptions of the potential effects of HIE on healthcare costs, quality of care, clinicians' time, patients' privacy concerns, and willingness to pay for HIE.

RESULTS

After excluding 253 physicians who did not see any outpatients, we analyzed 1043 responses. Overall, 70% indicated that HIE would reduce costs, while 86% said it would improve quality and 76% believed that it would save time. On the other hand, 16% reported being very concerned about HIE's effect on privacy, while 55.0% were somewhat concerned and 29% not at all concerned. Slightly more than half of the physicians (54%) said they would be willing to pay an unspecified monthly fee to participate in HIE, but only 37% said they would be willing to pay $150 per month for it. Primary care physicians and those in larger practices tended to have more positive attitudes toward HIE.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians perceive that HIE will have generally positive effects, though a considerable fraction harbor concerns about privacy. While physicians may be willing to participate in HIE, they are not consistently willing to pay to participate. HIE business models that require substantial physician subscription fees may face significant challenges.

摘要

目的

评估医生对健康信息交换(HIE)的态度以及参与 HIE 的意愿支付金额。

设计

我们于 2007 年对马萨诸塞州的 1296 名持照医生(77%的回应率)进行了横断面邮件调查。

测量

对 HIE 对医疗成本、护理质量、临床医生时间、患者隐私问题以及参与 HIE 的意愿支付金额的潜在影响的看法。

结果

在排除了 253 名没有看任何门诊的医生后,我们分析了 1043 份回复。总体而言,70%的医生表示 HIE 将降低成本,而 86%的医生表示 HIE 将提高质量,76%的医生认为 HIE 将节省时间。另一方面,16%的医生报告对 HIE 对隐私的影响非常关注,而 55.0%的医生有些关注,29%的医生则毫不关注。略多于一半的医生(54%)表示愿意支付不明确的每月费用参与 HIE,但只有 37%的医生表示愿意每月支付 150 美元。初级保健医生和规模较大的实践中的医生往往对 HIE 持更积极的态度。

结论

医生认为 HIE 将产生普遍的积极影响,但相当一部分人对隐私问题表示担忧。虽然医生可能愿意参与 HIE,但他们并不总是愿意为此付费。需要医生支付大量订阅费的 HIE 商业模式可能面临重大挑战。

相似文献

1
Physician attitudes toward health information exchange: results of a statewide survey.医生对健康信息交换的态度:全州范围调查的结果。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):66-70. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3241.
2
Physicians' potential use and preferences related to health information exchange.医生在健康信息交换方面的潜在使用和偏好。
Int J Med Inform. 2011 Mar;80(3):171-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.11.008. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
3
Physicians' perceptions and use of a health information exchange: a pilot program in South Korea.医生对健康信息交换的认知和使用:韩国的一个试点项目。
Telemed J E Health. 2012 Oct;18(8):604-12. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0261. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
4
Emergency physicians' perceptions of health information exchange.急诊医生对健康信息交换的看法。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):700-5. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2507. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
5
Readiness for electronic health records: comparison of characteristics of practices in a collaborative with the remainder of Massachusetts.电子健康记录的准备情况:与马萨诸塞州其他地区合作开展的实践特征比较
Inform Prim Care. 2008;16(2):129-37. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v16i2.684.
6
Consumer experience with and attitudes toward health information technology: a nationwide survey.消费者对健康信息技术的体验和态度:一项全国性调查。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jan 1;20(1):152-6. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001062. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
7
User experiences with different regional health information exchange systems in Finland.用户在芬兰不同地区卫生信息交换系统中的体验。
Int J Med Inform. 2014 Jan;83(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.10.002. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
8
The Potential of Blockchain Technology for Health Information Exchange: Experimental Study From Patients' Perspectives.区块链技术在健康信息交换中的潜力:基于患者视角的实验研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 20;21(6):e14184. doi: 10.2196/14184.
9
Barriers to Health Information Exchange Among Ambulatory Physicians: Results From a Nationally Representative Sample.门诊医生间健康信息交换的障碍:一项全国代表性样本研究结果。
J Healthc Qual. 2023;45(6):352-358. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000404.
10
Public attitudes toward health information exchange: perceived benefits and concerns.公众对健康信息交换的态度:感知到的益处和担忧。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Dec;17(12 Spec No.):SP111-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of Incentives in the Use of Blockchain-Based Platforms for Sharing Sensitive Health Data: Experimental Study.激励措施在基于区块链的敏感健康数据共享平台使用中的作用:实验研究
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 18;25:e41805. doi: 10.2196/41805.
2
Evolution of Health Information Sharing Between Health Care Organizations: Potential of Nonfungible Tokens.医疗保健组织间健康信息共享的演变:非同质化代币的潜力
Interact J Med Res. 2023 Apr 12;12:e42685. doi: 10.2196/42685.
3
Behavioral Health Professionals' Perceptions on Patient-Controlled Granular Information Sharing (Part 1): Focus Group Study.行为健康专业人员对患者控制的细粒度信息共享的看法(第1部分):焦点小组研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Apr 20;9(4):e21208. doi: 10.2196/21208.
4
Mental health professional perspectives on health data sharing: Mixed methods study.心理健康专业人士对健康数据共享的看法:混合方法研究。
Health Informatics J. 2020 Sep;26(3):2067-2082. doi: 10.1177/1460458219893848. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
5
The Impacts of the Perceived Transparency of Privacy Policies and Trust in Providers for Building Trust in Health Information Exchange: Empirical Study.隐私政策感知透明度及对提供者的信任对建立健康信息交换信任的影响:实证研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Nov 26;7(4):e14050. doi: 10.2196/14050.
6
Hospital physicians' views on discharge and readmission processes: a qualitative study from Norway.医院医生对出院和再入院流程的看法:一项来自挪威的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 27;9(8):e031297. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031297.
7
Linking the health data system in the U.S.: Challenges to the benefits.连接美国的健康数据系统:收益面临的挑战。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2017 Oct 14;4(4):410-417. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2017.09.006. eCollection 2017 Oct 10.
8
The Potential of Blockchain Technology for Health Information Exchange: Experimental Study From Patients' Perspectives.区块链技术在健康信息交换中的潜力:基于患者视角的实验研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 20;21(6):e14184. doi: 10.2196/14184.
9
A Study to Elicit Behavioral Health Patients' and Providers' Opinions on Health Records Consent.一项征集行为健康患者和医疗服务提供者对健康记录同意书看法的研究。
J Law Med Ethics. 2017 Jun;45(2):238-259. doi: 10.1177/1073110517720653. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
10
Improving performance in the ED through laboratory information exchange systems.通过实验室信息交换系统提高急诊科的工作效率。
Int J Emerg Med. 2018 Mar 12;11(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12245-018-0179-6.

本文引用的文献

1
The state of regional health information organizations: current activities and financing.区域卫生信息组织的现状:当前活动与资金筹措
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Jan-Feb;27(1):w60-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.1.w60. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
2
The Santa Barbara County Care Data Exchange: what happened?圣巴巴拉县医疗数据交换:发生了什么?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):w568-80. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.w568. Epub 2007 Aug 1.
3
Physicians and electronic health records: a statewide survey.医生与电子健康记录:一项全州范围的调查。
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Mar 12;167(5):507-12. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.5.507.
4
Correlates of electronic health record adoption in office practices: a statewide survey.门诊实践中电子健康记录采用情况的相关因素:一项全州范围的调查。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Jan-Feb;14(1):110-7. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2187. Epub 2006 Oct 26.
5
The Indiana network for patient care: a working local health information infrastructure. An example of a working infrastructure collaboration that links data from five health systems and hundreds of millions of entries.印第安纳州患者护理网络:一个有效的地方卫生信息基础设施。这是一个有效的基础设施合作范例,它连接了来自五个卫生系统的数据和数亿条记录。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Sep-Oct;24(5):1214-20. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1214.
6
Missing clinical information during primary care visits.基层医疗就诊期间临床信息缺失。
JAMA. 2005 Feb 2;293(5):565-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.5.565.
7
The value of health care information exchange and interoperability.医疗保健信息交换与互操作性的价值。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jan-Jun;Suppl Web Exclusives:W5-10-W5-18. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.w5.10.
8
A randomized, controlled trial of clinical information shared from another institution.一项关于来自另一机构共享临床信息的随机对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Jan;39(1):14-23. doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.120794.
9
Design and implementation of the Indianapolis Network for Patient Care and Research.印第安纳波利斯患者护理与研究网络的设计与实施。
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1995 Jan;83(1):48-56.