Suppr超能文献

医生对健康信息交换的认知和使用:韩国的一个试点项目。

Physicians' perceptions and use of a health information exchange: a pilot program in South Korea.

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Telemed J E Health. 2012 Oct;18(8):604-12. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0261. Epub 2012 Feb 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We examined physicians' perceived needs, benefits, and concerns regarding health information exchange (HIE) technology prior to experiencing it and their actual usage of exchanged information in care processes during an HIE pilot program in South Korea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a survey through a structured questionnaire to collect data on physician perceptions about an HIE prior to implementation. We analyzed responses using descriptive statistics and one-way analyses of variance. We also conducted a post-implementation survey through a computerized tool designed to collect data on physician assessment of HIE item usefulness. We defined two indices to measure the volume of information flow and usefulness for individual HIE items and analyzed the indices with Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Physicians' overall perceptions about the need for an HIE and benefits of the technology were positive despite their concerns about information safety and security, system costs, and disputes between care providers in cases of malpractice. We found that physician practice settings significantly influenced the details of their perceptions. In the both pre- and post-implementation studies, the most needed and valued information were pathology and lab results, diagnostic imaging, medication, and working diagnosis. Physicians most agreed with the benefit potentials in the quality domain, least agreed with those in time and cost savings of healthcare delivery, and least worried about the decrease in revenues resulting from the technology.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall physician acceptance of the HIE technology in South Korea is promising, but the adoption and diffusion strategy needs to be tailored to the type of physician practice. Concerted efforts may be needed to realize the much-anticipated potential of healthcare cost savings.

摘要

目的

在韩国的一项健康信息交换(HIE)试点项目中,我们在体验 HIE 技术之前,调查了医生对其的感知需求、益处和顾虑,并在 HIE 过程中研究了他们实际在医疗过程中使用所交换信息的情况。

材料与方法

我们通过结构化问卷进行了一项调查,以收集医生在实施 HIE 之前对 HIE 的感知数据。我们使用描述性统计和单向方差分析来分析响应。我们还通过计算机工具进行了实施后的调查,该工具旨在收集医生对 HIE 项目有用性的评估数据。我们定义了两个指标来衡量单个 HIE 项目的信息流和有用性的量,并使用 Fisher 精确检验分析了这些指标。

结果

尽管医生对信息安全和保密性、系统成本以及医疗事故中医疗服务提供者之间的纠纷表示担忧,但他们对 HIE 的总体需求和技术益处的看法仍然是积极的。我们发现,医生的实践环境显著影响了他们看法的细节。在实施前和实施后的研究中,最需要和最有价值的信息是病理学和实验室结果、诊断成像、药物和工作诊断。医生最认同质量领域的潜在效益,最不认同医疗保健交付的时间和成本节约方面的潜在效益,最不担心该技术会导致收入减少。

结论

韩国医生对 HIE 技术的总体接受度是有希望的,但需要根据医生实践的类型调整采用和扩散策略。可能需要共同努力,以实现预期的医疗成本节约潜力。

相似文献

1
Physicians' perceptions and use of a health information exchange: a pilot program in South Korea.
Telemed J E Health. 2012 Oct;18(8):604-12. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0261. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
2
Patients' perceptions of a health information exchange: a pilot program in South Korea.
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Feb;82(2):98-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 May 30.
3
Can a health information exchange save healthcare costs? Evidence from a pilot program in South Korea.
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Sep;84(9):658-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 May 23.
4
Physician attitudes toward health information exchange: results of a statewide survey.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):66-70. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3241.
5
Development of a tripolar model of technology acceptance: Hospital-based physicians' perspective on EHR.
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jun;102:50-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
6
Observational study and estimate of cost savings from use of a health information exchange in an academic emergency department.
J Emerg Med. 2014 Feb;46(2):250-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.05.068. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
7
Emergency physicians' perceptions of health information exchange.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):700-5. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2507. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
8
Health information exchange in Finland: Usage of different access types and predictors of paper use.
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Feb;122:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
9
An investigation on physicians' acceptance of hospital information systems: a case study.
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Dec;81(12):810-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.05.003. Epub 2012 May 29.
10
Undirected health IT implementation in ambulatory care favors paper-based workarounds and limits health data exchange.
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Nov;84(11):920-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

2
Reinforcing Primary Care in Korea: Policy Implications, Data Sources, and Research Methods.
J Korean Med Sci. 2025 Mar 3;40(8):e109. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e109.
3
Physicians' Perspectives on the Impact of Insurance Status on Clinical Decision-Making in Saudi Arabia.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 7;16(2):e53756. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53756. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Impact of Provider Prior Use of HIE on System Complexity, Performance, Patient Care, Quality and System Concerns.
Inf Syst Front. 2022;24(1):121-131. doi: 10.1007/s10796-020-10064-x. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
7
Linking the health data system in the U.S.: Challenges to the benefits.
Int J Nurs Sci. 2017 Oct 14;4(4):410-417. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2017.09.006. eCollection 2017 Oct 10.
8
Health Information Exchange Use (1990-2015): A Systematic Review.
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2017 Dec 7;5(1):27. doi: 10.5334/egems.249.

本文引用的文献

1
Views on health information sharing and privacy from primary care practices using electronic medical records.
Int J Med Inform. 2011 Feb;80(2):94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.11.005. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
2
Physicians' opinions of a health information exchange.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Jan-Feb;18(1):60-5. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.006502. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
3
Health information exchange: persistent challenges and new strategies.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 May-Jun;17(3):288-94. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.003673.
4
Health information exchange: participation by Minnesota primary care practices.
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Apr 12;170(7):622-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.54.
5
Success in health information exchange projects: solving the implementation puzzle.
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Apr;70(8):1159-65. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.041. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
6
Physician attitudes toward health information exchange: results of a statewide survey.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):66-70. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M3241.
7
Health information exchange in small-to-medium sized family medicine practices: motivators, barriers, and potential facilitators of adoption.
Int J Med Inform. 2010 Feb;79(2):123-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.12.001. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
8
Understanding the decisions and values of stakeholders in health information exchanges: experiences from Massachusetts.
Am J Public Health. 2009 May;99(5):950-5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.144873. Epub 2009 Mar 19.
9
The use of health information technology in seven nations.
Int J Med Inform. 2008 Dec;77(12):848-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.007. Epub 2008 Jul 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验