Wang Lei, Harms Michael P, Staggs Jarrod M, Xiong Chengjie, Morris John C, Csernansky John G, Galvin James E
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.
Arch Neurol. 2010 Jan;67(1):99-106. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.292.
To compare longitudinal changes in the hippocampal structure in subjects with very mild dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) treated with donepezil hydrochloride, untreated subjects with very mild DAT, and controls without dementia.
MPRAGE sequences were collected approximately 2 years apart on two 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging systems, yielding 2 cohorts. Large-deformation high-dimensional brain mapping was used to compute deformation of hippocampal subfields.
A dementia clinic at Washington University School of Medicine.
Subjects came from 2 sources: 18 untreated subjects with DAT and 26 controls were drawn from a previous longitudinal study; 18 treated subjects with DAT were studied prospectively, and 44 controls were drawn from a longitudinal study from the same period. Intervention Patients were prescribed donepezil by their physician.
Hippocampal volume loss and surface deformation.
There was no significant cohort effect at baseline; therefore, the 2 groups of control subjects were combined. The potential confounding effect of cohort/scanner was dealt with by including it as a covariate in statistical tests. There was no significant group effect in the rate of change of hippocampal volume or subfield deformation. Further exploration showed that compared with the untreated subjects with DAT, the treated subjects with DAT did not differ in the rate of change in any of the hippocampal measures. They also did not differ from the controls, while the untreated subjects with DAT differed from the controls in the rates of change of hippocampal volume and CA1 and subiculum subfield deformations.
Treatment with donepezil did not alter the progression of hippocampal deformation in subjects with DAT in this study. Small sample size may have contributed to this outcome.
比较接受盐酸多奈哌齐治疗的极轻度阿尔茨海默型痴呆(DAT)患者、未接受治疗的极轻度DAT患者以及无痴呆的对照者海马结构的纵向变化。
在两台1.5-T磁共振成像系统上,相隔约2年收集MPRAGE序列,形成2个队列。采用大变形高维脑图谱来计算海马亚区的变形。
华盛顿大学医学院的痴呆症诊所。
受试者来自2个来源:18名未接受治疗的DAT患者和26名对照者来自先前的纵向研究;18名接受治疗的DAT患者进行前瞻性研究,44名对照者来自同一时期的纵向研究。干预措施:医生为患者开多奈哌齐。
海马体积损失和表面变形。
基线时无显著的队列效应;因此,将2组对照者合并。通过在统计检验中纳入队列/扫描仪作为协变量来处理队列/扫描仪的潜在混杂效应。海马体积或亚区变形的变化率无显著组间效应。进一步探索表明,与未接受治疗的DAT患者相比,接受治疗的DAT患者在任何海马测量指标的变化率上均无差异。他们与对照者也无差异,而未接受治疗的DAT患者在海马体积以及CA1和下托亚区变形的变化率上与对照者存在差异。
在本研究中,多奈哌齐治疗并未改变DAT患者海马变形的进展。小样本量可能导致了这一结果。