Suppr超能文献

单独使用丙泊酚或丙泊酚与阿芬太尼联合诱导麻醉后的注射痛、插管条件及心血管变化。

Injection pain, intubating conditions and cardiovascular changes following induction of anaesthesia with propofol alone or in combination with alfentanil.

作者信息

Saarnivaara L, Klemola U M

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Otolaryngological Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1991 Jan;35(1):19-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1991.tb03235.x.

Abstract

In a double-blind study, propofol (P) 2-2.5 mg.kg-1 preceded by saline (Sal) or alfentanil (A) 20-30 micrograms.kg-1 was used for anaesthetic induction in 59 young patients of ASA physical class I or II, premedicated with oxycodone 0.1 mg.kg-1 and atropine 0.01 mg.kg-1 i.m. The patients were randomly allocated to one of the four groups: Group 1 Sal + P2.5, Group 2 A20 + P2.5, Group 3 A30 + P2.5 and Group 4 A30 + P2. Pain on injection of propofol occurred in 67, 36 and 7% of the patients in the Sal + P2.5, A20 + P2.5 and A30 + P2 groups, respectively, but not at all in the A30 + P2.5 group. Intubating conditions were assessed as good, moderate, poor or impossible on the basis of jaw relaxation, ease of insertion of the tube and coughing on intubation, each on a three-point scale. In impossible cases, suxamethonium was used. In the Sal + P2.5 group, the frequencies of good, moderate, poor and impossible intubating conditions were 0, 38, 8 and 54%, respectively. The corresponding figures in the A30 + P2.5 group were 43, 46, 7 and 14% (P less than 0.05 between the groups). The other groups did not differ significantly from the Sal + P2.5 group. After injection of propofol, both systolic and diastolic arterial pressures decreased significantly in all other groups, with the exception of diastolic pressure in the Sal + P2.5 group, whereas heart rate did not differ from the control level. After intubation, systolic arterial pressure increased statistically significantly in the Sal + P2.5 and A30 + P2 groups and diastolic arterial pressure in all other groups with the exception of the A30 + P2.5 group when compared with the corresponding preceding values.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在一项双盲研究中,59例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I或II级的年轻患者,术前肌肉注射0.1mg/kg羟考酮和0.01mg/kg阿托品进行预处理,分别给予生理盐水(Sal)或20 - 30μg/kg阿芬太尼(A)后,再静脉注射2 - 2.5mg/kg丙泊酚(P)用于麻醉诱导。患者被随机分为四组:第1组Sal + P2.5,第2组A20 + P2.5,第3组A30 + P2.5,第4组A30 + P2。在Sal + P2.5、A20 + P2.5和A30 + P2组中,注射丙泊酚时疼痛的患者比例分别为67%、36%和7%,而在A30 + P2.5组中无一例出现疼痛。根据下颌松弛程度、气管导管插入难易程度和插管时咳嗽情况,每项按三分制评估插管条件为优、中、差或无法插管。在无法插管的情况下,使用琥珀胆碱。在Sal + P2.5组中,优、中、差和无法插管条件的频率分别为0%、38%、8%和54%。A30 + P2.5组的相应数据为43%、46%、7%和14%(两组间P<0.05)。其他组与Sal + P2.5组无显著差异。注射丙泊酚后,除Sal + P2.5组的舒张压外,所有其他组的收缩压和舒张压均显著下降,而心率与对照水平无差异。与相应的先前值相比,插管后,Sal + P2.5组和A30 + P2组的收缩压有统计学显著升高,除A30 + P2.5组外,所有其他组的舒张压有统计学显著升高。(摘要截短至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验