Suppr超能文献

受伤伴有癫痫/发作人群的医院治疗结果的差异。

Disparities in hospital outcomes for injured people with epilepsy/seizures.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72202-3591, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2010 May;51(5):862-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02492.x. Epub 2010 Jan 7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Controlling for injury and patient characteristics, one would expect comparable in-hospital outcomes for injured patients with and without epilepsy. The historical stigma associated with epilepsy is well-documented, yet potential disparities in injury care for people with epilepsy/seizures have not been examined. We compared in-hospital outcomes of injured patients with epilepsy/seizures with patients without epilepsy/seizures and tested the hypothesis that injured people with epilepsy have worse outcomes.

METHODS

Existing data were analyzed from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample-the largest, longitudinal, all-payer inpatient care database in the United States. Injured patients of all ages were included. Multivariable logistic regression was used to control for patient and hospital characteristics.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

In-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

When controlling for patient and injury characteristics, our results show that people with epilepsy/seizures were more likely to die in-hospital than people without epilepsy [odds ratio (OR) 1.17, p < 0.001]. People with epilepsy were significantly more likely to have a traumatic brain injury diagnosis than similar individuals without epilepsy (unintentional injuries OR 2.81, p < 0.001; interpersonal violence OR 6.0, p < 0.001). By mechanism of injury, significantly increased risk of death was observed for injuries from falls (OR 1.21, p < 0.001), other transport injuries (OR 2.04, p = 0.01), struck by/against (OR 1.85, p = 0.02), and suffocation (OR 10.93, p = 0.009). People with epilepsy/seizures receiving firearm injuries were less likely to die in-hospital (OR 0.25, p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Disparities in hospital outcomes for people with epilepsy deserve further attention. Identifying the underlying causes of these disparities will allow for the development of targeted prevention interventions.

摘要

目的

在控制损伤和患者特征的情况下,人们预计患有癫痫和无癫痫的受伤患者的院内结局相当。与癫痫相关的历史耻辱是有据可查的,但尚未检查癫痫患者的受伤护理是否存在潜在差异。我们比较了有癫痫/发作的受伤患者与无癫痫/发作的患者的院内结局,并检验了癫痫患者的受伤结局更差的假设。

方法

利用美国最大的、纵向的、所有支付者住院患者护理数据库——全国住院患者样本中的现有数据进行分析。纳入了所有年龄段的受伤患者。采用多变量逻辑回归控制患者和医院特征。

主要观察指标

院内死亡率。

结果

在控制患者和损伤特征后,我们的结果表明,癫痫患者比无癫痫患者更有可能在院内死亡[比值比(OR)1.17,p<0.001]。癫痫患者更有可能被诊断为创伤性脑损伤,而无癫痫的相似患者则不然(非故意伤害 OR 2.81,p<0.001;人际暴力 OR 6.0,p<0.001)。按损伤机制,观察到从跌倒(OR 1.21,p<0.001)、其他运输损伤(OR 2.04,p=0.01)、被击中/碰撞(OR 1.85,p=0.02)和窒息(OR 10.93,p=0.009)引起的损伤死亡风险显著增加。接受火器伤害的癫痫患者在院内死亡的可能性较低(OR 0.25,p<0.001)。

讨论

癫痫患者的医院结局差异值得进一步关注。确定这些差异的根本原因将有助于制定有针对性的预防干预措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验