Hôpital R. Poincaré, AP-HP, Garches, France, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Mar-Apr;24(3):273-81. doi: 10.1177/1545968309347682. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
Poor control of reaching in spastic hemiparetic patients could be because of a combination of poor individuation of joints, weakness, spasticity, and/or sensory loss.
To assess the effect of botulinum toxin injections (BTIs) on spasticity, upper-limb function, and kinematics of reaching movements in patients with spastic hemiparesis caused by brain injury.
Fifteen patients with spastic hemiparesis and 9 healthy controls were included in this single-site, open-labeled study. The trajectories of reaching movements were recorded, and kinematic variables were computed. A clinical evaluation included the Motor Activity Log, the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), and the Box and Block Test (BBT). Patients were assessed before (M0), 1 month after a first (M1), and 1 month after a second BTI (M4, at 4 months) in proximal and distal muscles.
Significant differences were found between hemiparetic patients and healthy participants for all kinematic parameters. All parameters tended to improve after BTI. This effect was significant for velocity and smoothness. Functional scores also tended to improve. Improvements were greater at M4 than at M1, although the differences were not significant.
Kinematic parameters improved following BTI, without significant changes in clinical outcomes such as ARAT and BBT. The decrease in spasticity alone does not seem to explain the results, which may be a result of adaptation to the decrease in hypertonicity leading to increased use of the arm and possibly an increase in antagonist muscle strength.
痉挛性偏瘫患者的上肢运动控制不佳可能是由于关节分辨力差、无力、痉挛和/或感觉丧失等多种因素的综合作用。
评估肉毒毒素注射(BTI)对脑损伤引起的痉挛性偏瘫患者上肢痉挛、功能和运动学的影响。
本单中心、开放性研究纳入了 15 例痉挛性偏瘫患者和 9 名健康对照者。记录了上肢伸展运动的轨迹,并计算了运动学变量。临床评估包括运动活动日志、动作研究上肢测试(ARAT)和方块和木块测试(BBT)。患者在近端和远端肌肉注射第一剂肉毒毒素前(M0)、1 个月后(M1)和 4 个月后(M4)进行评估。
偏瘫患者与健康参与者在所有运动学参数上均存在显著差异。BTI 后所有参数均有改善趋势,速度和流畅度改善显著。功能评分也有改善趋势。M4 时的改善大于 M1,但差异无统计学意义。
BTI 后运动学参数有所改善,但 ARAT 和 BBT 等临床结果无显著变化。痉挛程度的降低似乎不能单独解释这些结果,可能是由于对高张力的适应导致上肢使用增加,以及拮抗肌力量的增加。