Kwan Rita O, Cureton Elizabeth, Dozier Kristopher, Curran Brian, Sadjadi Javid, Victorino Gregory P
Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco-East Bay, Alameda County Medical Center, Oakland, California 94610, USA.
J Trauma. 2010 May;68(5):1186-91. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181bb9878.
BACKGROUND: Obesity is a risk factor for poor outcomes after trauma, and circulating levels of ghrelin are decreased in obese patients. We hypothesized that ghrelin modifies microvascular permeability. The purposes of this study were to determine (1) the effect of ghrelin on microvascular permeability, (2) the effect of ghrelin on microvascular permeability during lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation, (3) the involvement of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R1a) cell receptor, and (4) the involvement of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappaB). METHODS: Hydraulic permeability (Lp), a measure of transendothelial fluid leak, was measured in rat mesenteric postcapillary venules. Lp was measured during continuous administration of (1) ghrelin (3 micromol/L), (2) ghrelin and systemic LPS (10 mg/kg), (3) the GHS-R1a receptor antagonist, (D-Arg1 D-Phe5 D-Trp7,9 Leu11)-substance P (9 micromol/L) plus ghrelin and LPS, and (4) an NF-kappaB inhibitor, parthenolide (10 micromol/L) plus ghrelin and LPS. RESULTS: Ghrelin alone had no effect (p > 0.7). Compared with LPS alone, ghrelin plus LPS decreased Lp (Lp: ghrelin + LPS = 1.60 +/- 0.16 vs. LPS = 2.27 +/- 0.14, p < 0.006). The GHS-R1a ghrelin receptor antagonist blunted the effect of ghrelin by 86% during LPS-induced inflammation (Lp: ghrelin + LPS = 1.60 +/- 0.16 vs. ghrelin antagonist + ghrelin + LPS = 2.17 +/- 0.27, p < 0.018). NF-kappaB inhibition did not influence the initial increased microvascular leak effect of ghrelin (p > 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: Although ghrelin has no effect on basal microvascular permeability, it has a biphasic effect with an overall decrease in microvascular permeability during LPS-induced inflammation through the GHS-R1a receptor, independent of NF-kappaB. Ghrelin is a key mediator of inflammation and may contribute to the increased morbidity and mortality in obese trauma patients.
背景:肥胖是创伤后预后不良的一个危险因素,肥胖患者体内胃饥饿素的循环水平降低。我们推测胃饥饿素可改变微血管通透性。本研究的目的是确定:(1)胃饥饿素对微血管通透性的影响;(2)胃饥饿素在脂多糖(LPS)诱导的炎症过程中对微血管通透性的影响;(3)生长激素促分泌素受体(GHS-R1a)细胞受体的参与情况;(4)核因子κB(NF-κB)的参与情况。 方法:在大鼠肠系膜毛细血管后微静脉中测量液压通透性(Lp),这是一种衡量跨内皮液体渗漏的指标。在持续给予以下物质的过程中测量Lp:(1)胃饥饿素(3 μmol/L);(2)胃饥饿素和全身性LPS(10 mg/kg);(3)GHS-R1a受体拮抗剂,(D-精氨酸1、D-苯丙氨酸5、D-色氨酸7,9、亮氨酸11)-P物质(9 μmol/L)加胃饥饿素和LPS;(4)一种NF-κB抑制剂,小白菊内酯(10 μmol/L)加胃饥饿素和LPS。 结果:单独使用胃饥饿素无影响(p>0.7)。与单独使用LPS相比,胃饥饿素加LPS可降低Lp(Lp:胃饥饿素+LPS = 1.60±0.16,而LPS = 2.27±0.14,p<0.006)。在LPS诱导的炎症过程中,GHS-R1a胃饥饿素受体拮抗剂使胃饥饿素的作用减弱了86%(Lp:胃饥饿素+LPS = 1.60±0.16,而胃饥饿素拮抗剂+胃饥饿素+LPS = 2.17±0.27,p<0.018)。抑制NF-κB并不影响胃饥饿素最初增加微血管渗漏的作用(p>0.8)。 结论:尽管胃饥饿素对基础微血管通透性无影响,但它具有双相作用,在LPS诱导的炎症过程中,通过GHS-R1a受体可使微血管通透性总体降低,且不依赖于NF-κB。胃饥饿素是炎症的关键介质,可能导致肥胖创伤患者发病率和死亡率增加。
J Trauma. 2010-5
Front Immunol. 2019-5-3
Circ Res. 2018-8-3
Inflammation. 2015-4
Physiology (Bethesda). 2012-8
J Neurotrauma. 2011-10-26
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008-9-12
Injury. 2007-12
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2007-8-21
J Endocrinol Invest. 2006-11
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006-10